Hi, my instructor left this as an exercise, but I got confused in the second part. Could you please help me?(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

cl(A[itex]\cap[/itex]B)[itex]\subseteq[/itex]cl A [itex]\cap[/itex] cl B

But the reverse is not true. Prove this and give a counterexample on the reverse statement.

My attempt:

If x[itex]\in[/itex] A[itex]\cap[/itex]B, then x[itex]\in[/itex] cl(A[itex]\cap[/itex]B)

x[itex]\in[/itex] A and x[itex]\in[/itex] B [itex]\Rightarrow[/itex] x[itex]\in[/itex] cl(A) and x[itex]\in[/itex]cl(B). Hence,

cl(A[itex]\cap[/itex]B)[itex]\subseteq[/itex]cl A [itex]\cap[/itex] cl B

Does this proof have any flaws? It is an easy one, I guess, but I feel a bit confused. And I do not understand why the reverse is wrong. Can't we use the same method? Thanks for any help.

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

# Need help with a proof on closure

Know someone interested in this topic? Share a link to this question via email,
Google+,
Twitter, or
Facebook

- Similar discussions for: Need help with a proof on closure

Loading...

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**