Need help with finding residue of a simple function

  • Thread starter Thread starter joris_pixie
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function Residue
joris_pixie
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
Need help with finding residue of a "simple" function

Hello,
I'm trying to find the residue z=0 of f(z) = (1 + z)e^(3/z)

I understand this is a essential singularity. I know the answer is 15/2 but I can't seem to find the solution.

I've tried this so far:

f(z) = (1 + z) ( (3/z) + 9/2z² + ...)
But now I'm stuck ! please help :)
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org


Do you know what the residue is? You've expanded the exponential in a series - why? It's the correct thing to do, but do you know why?

It's because the residue of a function at z = 0 is given by the coefficient of 1/z in its Laurent series expansion. So, what's the coefficient of 1/z in your series expansion? (You have to multiply your two series together!)
 


Aha !
I'm going to study the Laurent series expansion part again... ;)

Thank you ! :)
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
14
Views
3K
Back
Top