Need help with simple math problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter Void
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around the mathematical expression 1.7x10^30, which equates to approximately 1.7 nonillion years, a time span far beyond human comprehension. Participants highlight the enormity of this figure, comparing it to the age of the universe, which is about 13.8 billion years. The conversation includes a humorous analogy involving quantum tunneling, illustrating the absurdity of such vast timeframes. The participants express a mix of awe and humor regarding the implications of such long durations. Overall, the thread emphasizes the challenge of grasping the scale of time represented by large numbers.
Void
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
how many years would 1.7x10^30 equal? i don't understand how the exponents work when i put into my calculator.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
1,700,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 years

Paden Roder
 
A horrifying amount that don't bear thinking about, even if the time unit you omitted to mention was the microsecond.
 
could you explain what you mean arildno? and thanks for the calculation rod. :smile:
 
It was a half-joke, but think about it.
Can we really comprehend the timespan implied?
If you look at it in number of years, then it's about 3 times the age of the universe!
That's one heck of a loooong time!
 
LOL!

Hey Void, I got some trivia for you.

According to quantum theory, specifically quantum tunneling, if you were to run into a wall once every second, it would take you roughly the age of the universe to pass through it. HEHE!

In your number of years that we calculated, you could have passed through the wall, passed back to get your wallet that you forgot, and then run back to the other side.

Paden Roder
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top