Solving Integrals Involving Complex Exponentials

  • Thread starter Thread starter Xyius
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integral
Click For Summary
The integral under discussion involves the expression ∫_0^{∞} e^{-\frac{t^2}{\tau^2}} e^{i\omega_{kn} t} cos(ω_0 t). The cosine term is rewritten as e^{iω_0 t}, with the understanding that the real part is taken afterward. Concerns are raised about the validity of combining the real part of one complex exponential with another and whether the same method applies if the trigonometric function were sine. A suggestion is made to use the identity cos(ω_0 t) = (e^{iω_0 t} + e^{-iω_0 t})/2 for simplification. The discussion emphasizes the need for clarity in handling complex exponentials in integrals.
Xyius
Messages
501
Reaction score
4
Hello all,

I am working on a Physics problem and it boils down to solving the following integral.

\int_0^{∞}e^{-\frac{t^2}{\tau^2}}e^{i\omega_{kn} t}\cos(\omega_0 t)

What I did was re-write the cosine term as..

cos(\omega_0 t)=e^{i\omega_0 t}

Where in the above expression it is understood that one takes the real part of the exponential. I then plugged it into the above integral expression, completed the square inside the exponential, then used the following identity.

\int_{-∞}^{∞}e^{-a(x+b)^2}dx=\sqrt{\frac{\pi}{a}}

I then added a factor of 1/2 in the above expression since the limits are only going from 0 to ∞.

But I have a few questions / problems with this.

1. What if the trigonometric function were a sine? My method I did here would still produce the same answer. Is this correct?

2. I have a problem with combining the real part of one complex exponential with the entire part of another complex exponential. Doesn't seem like it would be okay to do.

3. Are there any other ways to integrate this?

Thank you for your time.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Xyius said:
Hello all,

I am working on a Physics problem and it boils down to solving the following integral.

\int_0^{∞}e^{-\frac{t^2}{\tau^2}}e^{i\omega_{kn} t}\cos(\omega_0 t)

What I did was re-write the cosine term as..

cos(\omega_0 t)=e^{i\omega_0 t}

Where in the above expression it is understood that one takes the real part of the exponential. I then plugged it into the above integral expression, completed the square inside the exponential, then used the following identity.

\int_{-∞}^{∞}e^{-a(x+b)^2}dx=\sqrt{\frac{\pi}{a}}

I then added a factor of 1/2 in the above expression since the limits are only going from 0 to ∞.

But I have a few questions / problems with this.

1. What if the trigonometric function were a sine? My method I did here would still produce the same answer. Is this correct?

2. I have a problem with combining the real part of one complex exponential with the entire part of another complex exponential. Doesn't seem like it would be okay to do.

That step worries me too. Why don't you just substitute$$
\cos(\omega_0t) = \frac{e^{i\omega_0t}+e^{-i\omega_0t}}{2}$$and just work it out? Just a suggestion because I haven't tried it.
 
Don't know why I didn't think of that! Thanks! I'll go through it now.
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K