Need hint regarding Euler's constant question

  • Thread starter Thread starter librastar
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Constant
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
4 replies · 3K views
librastar
Messages
15
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Show that Euler's constant is 0 < [tex]\gamma[/tex] < 1

Homework Equations



According to my book, [tex]\gamma[/tex] = lim((1+1/2+...+1/n) - log n) as n approaches infinity

The Attempt at a Solution



At first glance I was thinking about proving by contradiction.

First I assume [tex]\gamma[/tex] is equal to 0.

Then I will get lim(1+1/2+...+1/n) = lim (log n) as n approaches infinity.

However 1+1/2+...+1/n is a harmonic series which diverges, so the equality does not hold.

So [tex]\gamma[/tex] does not equal 0.

Next I assume [tex]\gamma[/tex] is less than 0.

Since log function never yields negative result, this implies that lim(1+1/2+...+1/n) < lim(log n) as n approaches infinity.

Again due to the divergent nature of harmonic series, the inequality does not hold.

These are all I have for now.

=================================

I feel I have logic error in the attempt to solve the problem, and I hope that someone will give me a hint on the correct solution.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Keep in mind that

[tex]\lim_{x\to a} [f(x)-g(x)]=\lim_{x\to a}f(x)-\lim_{x\to a}g(x)[/tex]

Is only true if both the limits on the RHS exist.

I haven't tried the problem yet, but you might consider using the squeeze theorem.
 
Office_Shredder said:
For proving the positivity of [tex]\gamma[/tex] you should think about Riemann sums

Same for showing it is less than 1. Very simple and nice when you see the idea.