Need your help with a collection of 0 reply threads

[fresh_42]

Did the links get misaligned with the titles on the google sheet?

It's even worse: it is not a constant shift. Someone sorted along the "subjects" column without sorting all of it.

 

[vela]

It's even worse: it is not a constant shift. Someone sorted along the "subjects" column without sorting all of it.

Sorry, I think it was me. I restored the version from this morning (9:17 AM Pacific) where everything was aligned, so if you marked any threads as done after that time, you may need to mark it again.

 

[Greg Bernhardt]

Home stretch! Down to 151 and 1/4 of those are labeled Matlab which @kreil will review

Google sheets link

 

[Astronuc]

Any takers on this one?
https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/what-is-the-coulomb-gauge.763088/

If you know who wrote it, please let us know so we can attribute a writer. Apparently, the post is an entry is from our old Library feature. I miss that feature.

And another Library entry: What is susceptibility?
https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/what-is-susceptibility.763178/

Did some of this material get put into an Insight article?

I'm trying to figure how to relate these two to other threads/posts. The subjects definitely show up in other threads/posts, and as old Library entries or FAQs, they are essentially stand-alone posts.

Any ideas?

 

[jedishrfu]

You could review the related threads from the list below the post and comment on which thread is most relevant.

 

[Greg Bernhardt]

Down to 141, maybe all the easy ones are taken care of? @kreil will look at the MATLAB threads hopefully this weekend. For the two FAQ library threads, maybe there is a concept or explanation that someone can expand on, or are they pretty well perfect? Thanks again all!

Google sheets link

 

[fresh_42]

For the two FAQ library threads, maybe there is a concept or explanation that someone can expand on, or are they pretty well perfect?

I simply added a comment with the recommendation link to an existing Insight article each.

 

[Greg Bernhardt]

I simply added a comment with the recommendation link to an existing Insight article each.

That may actually spark some replies from the community too just with the bump

 

[gmax137]

I posted a reply to this one:
https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/air-pressure-with-bernoullis-equation.144674/post-6652812
The OP is asking about specific problems in a cited textbook; I punted to "other Bernoulli threads." I hope that is OK.

 

[Astronuc]

I simply added a comment with the recommendation link to an existing Insight article each.

That's what I had in mind.

 

[Astronuc]

I posted a reply to this one:
https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/air-pressure-with-bernoullis-equation.144674/post-6652812
The OP is asking about specific problems in a cited textbook; I punted to "other Bernoulli threads." I hope that is OK.

We also have an Insights article on Demystifying Bernoulli's equation.

https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/demystifying-the-often-misunderstood-bernoullis-equation/

 

[Greg Bernhardt]

That's what I had in mind.

Yeah linking to a relevant Insight is a good idea and easy!

 

[dlgoff]

@Greg Bernhardt
Just curious. How many unanswered threads are there now?

 

[Astronuc]

@Greg Bernhardt
Just curious. How many unanswered threads are there now?

Less than 140 based on Greg's comment in post #96 in this thread.
https://www.physicsforums.com/threa...ction-of-0-reply-threads.1016551/post-6652804

 

[dlgoff]

Less than 140 based on Greg's comment in post #96 in this thread.
https://www.physicsforums.com/threa...ction-of-0-reply-threads.1016551/post-6652804

Thanks @Astronuc

 

[kuruman]

I posted replies to two more threads. It's slim pickings, though $~\dots$

 

[dlgoff]

It's slim pickings, though

That's a good thing.

 

[fresh_42]

And I checked two posts that had been answered by someone else

 

[gmax137]

We also have an Insights article on Demystifying Bernoulli's equation.

https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/demystifying-the-often-misunderstood-bernoullis-equation/

Thanks @Astronuc !
I added this to the 'old' thread.

 

[Greg Bernhardt]

Superb effort everyone! Down to 88 outside of Matlab.

 

[Office_Shredder]

I did my first one today, hurray.

I would be happy to try to do some of the Matlab ones, but I haven't done it in a while and I don't have access to Matlab so can't play around to remember how it all fits together.

 

[malawi_glenn]

I did one too :-)

 

[scottdave]

I looked at the links on your spreadsheet. I am willing to help.

Edit - I've done 2 so far

 

[scottdave]

Hi @Greg Bernhardt

Something is awry with the links in your spreadsheet. I did some, earlier today. Now when I click one, it goes to a completely different question.

For example: row 51 Jet Fire Calculations. The link in the spreadsheet is: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/.440899 but this points to something completely different.

I was able to do a search and find this -
https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/jet-fire-calculations.282233/
I was hoping maybe the rows got shifted or something, but I cannot find 282233 in your spreadsheet.

David Scott

 

[vela]

Something is awry with the links in your spreadsheet. I did some, earlier today. Now when I click one, it goes to a completely different question.

Someone did what I did awhile back and sorted the table on column E. I restored a version from earlier today where the links still matched up with the subjects.

 

[pbuk]

MathHelpBoards.com (MHB) has merged with PF!

.. and brought a load more unanswered threads with it. Quite a different style to the answers on MHB too (explicit answers to homework-style quesitons, some of which have ended up in non-homework topics).

 

[Greg Bernhardt]

.. and brought a load more unanswered threads with it. Quite a different style to the answers on MHB too (explicit answers to homework-style quesitons, some of which have ended up in non-homework topics).

It's messy for sure, but we'll get it figured out

 

[pbuk]

7 down, n - 7 to go but I'm done for a while. Looks like we've picked up some "characters" as well as posts, which is to be expected I suppose.

 

[pbuk]

I did another one. It would help if you could do a global RegExp replace on $\LaTeX$ tags on the imported posts - or perhaps you are already doing this, we just need to wait for it to work through them all.

 

[Greg Bernhardt]

I did another one. It would help if you could do a global RegExp replace on $\LaTeX$ tags on the imported posts - or perhaps you are already doing this, we just need to wait for it to work through them all.

Maybe you can help with this issue. I can't get single quotes and other tags types MHB was using to render. We are using this config for mathjax config. I have reached out to mathjax dev but nothing yet.

https://www.physicsforums.com/check-for-tex.js

(function () {
  var body = document.body.textContent;
  if (body.match(/(\$\$|##|\[tex\]|\[itex\]|\[math\]|\$|\()/)) {
    if (!window.MathJax) {
      window.MathJax = {
  loader: {
    load: ["ui/lazy"],
    source: {
      "ui/lazy": "https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/lazy.js"
    }
  },
  tex: {
    inlineMath: [
      ["[itex]", "[/itex]"],
      ["##", "##"],
      ['$','$'],
      ["\\(","\\)"],
      ["\(","\)"]
    ],
    displayMath: [
      ["[tex]", "[/tex]"],
      ["$$", "$$"],
      ["[math]","[/math]"],
      ["\\\[","\\\]"]
     
    ],
    processEscapes: true,
    macros: {
      href: "{}"
    },
    tags: "ams",
    autoload: {
      color: [],
      colorv2: ["color"]
    }
  },
  options: {
    skipHtmlTags: ["script", "noscript", "style", "textarea", "pre", "code"],
    ignoreHtmlClass: "tex2jax_ignore|dno",
    processHtmlClass: "tex2jax_process"
  }
};
    }
    var script = document.createElement("script");
    script.src = "https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/mathjax@3/es5/tex-chtml.js";
    script.async = true;
    document.head.appendChild(script);
  }
})();