Negative Kelvin temperature? (Recent Science paper)

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the concept of negative temperature as presented in a recent scientific paper. Participants explore the implications of negative temperatures in thermodynamics, particularly in relation to population inversion and entropy. The conversation includes theoretical explanations, challenges to understanding, and references to existing literature on the topic.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express confusion about how negative temperatures can exist, given that absolute zero (0 K) is defined as the state of minimal movement and energy levels.
  • One participant explains that in a system with two energy levels, if the excited state is overpopulated, the temperature must be negative to maintain the Maxwell distribution.
  • Another participant notes that negative temperature arises from the relationship between entropy and energy, where increased energy can lead to decreased entropy, resulting in a negative temperature.
  • Some argue that negative temperatures are not "cold" but rather hotter than any positive temperature, challenging common perceptions of temperature.
  • References are made to historical examples of negative temperatures, suggesting that this phenomenon is not entirely new and has been observed in systems like masers.
  • Concerns are raised about the media hype surrounding the recent findings, with some participants asserting that the concept has been known for decades.
  • Discussions include the organization of temperature on an extended number line, with some participants seeking clarification on how negative temperatures relate to positive ones.
  • There is mention of the flow of heat between objects of different temperatures, emphasizing that heat flows from negative to positive temperatures.
  • One participant questions the implications of negative temperatures in relation to gravity and the cosmological constant, suggesting a need for further exploration.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a mix of understanding and confusion regarding negative temperatures, with some agreeing on the thermodynamic definitions while others challenge the implications and hype surrounding the topic. No consensus is reached on the broader significance of the findings.

Contextual Notes

Some participants highlight the need for a deeper understanding of statistical mechanics to grasp the concept of negative temperatures, indicating that the discussion may be limited by varying levels of expertise among participants.

  • #31
Hold on! Let's clear something up. How does negative temperature hotter than all positive temperatures. I need clarification...
Hurkyl said:
Both number lines are ordered from smallest to largest. So 1 is a colder temperature than -1.

*: In the extended sense. I don't think[Hold
 
Science news on Phys.org
  • #32
The old posts pretty much explained every bit of it. Which part are you having trouble with?
 
  • #33
So if a negative temperature object is in contact with a positive temperature object then heat energy will flow from the negative temperature object to the positive energy object?

If this is so then will the negative temperature object get less negative in temperature over time (colder) until it reaches absolute zero and then becomes a positive temperature object?
 
  • #34
No. If you cool a negative temperature object, the temperature will become more negative until it goes to negative infinity and then "crosses over" to positive infinity and then continues to cool toward absolute zero. This looks weird because temperature is defined strangely. The reciprocal of the temperature is more fundamental than the temperature and behaves more intuitively as you cool it. The inverse temperature smoothly increases from negative to positive, crossing zero when the temperature crosses infinity.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: mfb
  • #35
My question is concerning what will happen to the negative temperature object if it comes in contact with the positive temperature object.
 
  • #36
It doesn't change the result.

If you put two objects at different temperatures together, the reciprocal of temperature of both objects will spontaneously move toward each other. (The amount one moves versus the other depends on the thermal mass, aka the heat capacity.)
 
  • #37
Why not give a direct answer?
What happens to the negative temperature object (not the positive one) when it comes in contact with the positive temperature object? Which one?
The temperature would remain the same.
The temperature would become more negative.
The temperature would become less negative.
 
  • #38
If you put a negative temperature object in contact with a positive temperature object, the negative temperature object will cool down and the positive temperature object will heat up. See reply #34 for what happens when the negative temperature object cools down.
 
  • #39
Does cooling down mean the temperature becomes less negative? Or more negative?
 
  • #40
Read the second sentence of #34.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: mfb
  • #41
Sorry, I see now. Thanks!

So this actually makes no sense (Unless there is a maximum possible temperature and lowest negative temperature). At what point does the negative temperature switches to a positive temperature without a limit?
 
  • #42
See the old posts. It is much easier to consider the inverse temperature, where you don't have such a jump.

0, approached from positive values, is the lowest possible temperature, and 0, approached from below, is the highest possible temperature. If you keep cooling an object with negative temperature, its temperature will go down, it will approach "infinite temperature (no meaningful sign here)" and then have a positive temperature afterwards.
 
  • #43
And what else that doesn't make sense is if 2 negative temperature (different) objects come in contact then the greater negative temperature object would become warmer until it reaches absolute 0.
 
  • #44
h1a8 said:
And what else that doesn't make sense is if 2 negative temperature (different) objects come in contact then the greater negative temperature object would become warmer until it reaches absolute 0.
The very negative temperature object becomes warmer only until it reaches the temperature of the less negative temperature object. They will both settle toward a medium-negative value.

The continuum of temperature values is from 0 up through +/- infinity and on up toward zero. Absolute zero is both the limit to which negative temperatures cannot reach from below and to which positive temperatures cannot sink from above. As has been suggested, consider inverse temperatures with + and - infinity as the limits on either end of the scale and "zero" in the middle and it is the exact same thing.
 
  • #45
Ok I understand. One more question.

Can anyone touch an object of negative temperature feel and just feel a comfortable warmth they touch it? Meaning, it will not severely burn or disintegrate, them but just feel warm to the touch?
 
  • #46
If thermal conductivity is low enough, it could work. But then you are actually touching an object where the surface has a normal positive temperature, while the interior might still have a negative one.

That is purely hypothetical - I don't think you can have a normal solid material that you could actually touch at a negative temperature.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
14K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
21K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K