Calculating Cell Potential Using Nernst Equation for Ag+ Voltaic Cell

  • Thread starter Thread starter pzona
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Nernst equation
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on using the Nernst equation to calculate the cell potential for a voltaic cell involving Ag+ with a copper anode and silver cathode. The user is unsure whether to solve for E°cell or Ecell, seeking clarification on their meanings and the appropriate values to use. They calculated E°cell as -0.982V but are confused about the correct value of n for the half-reaction. Other participants clarify that n represents the number of electrons transferred in the half-cell reaction, emphasizing that it should be an integer. The user ultimately seeks confirmation on their calculations and understanding of the terms involved in the Nernst equation.
pzona
Messages
234
Reaction score
0
This problem is homework from a lab I did yesterday. Normally I would just ask my TA, but since it's homework I can't. I could email him, but I feel like I'll probably get a faster response if I post this here

Homework Statement


Use the Nernst equation to determine the cell potential for the cell involving Ag+. This is from a voltaic cell I made using a copper anode and CuSO4 solution and a silver cathode and AgNO3, with a KNO3 solution as a salt bridge. I used a multimeter to calculate the cell potentials for other cells I built (using other metal cathodes and relevant solutions) because their concentrations were 1M, standard conditions. The AgNO3 was 0.1M so I need to use the Nernst equation to calculate cell potential (assuming all other factors, ex. temperature were standard).

Measured potential for the cell: -0.390V
Given oxidation potential for the copper half reaction: +0.34V


Homework Equations


The Nernst Equation:

E_{cell} = E^{o}_{cell} + 0.0592V(mol)/n * log_{10}Q

Half reaction at the cathode:

Ag+(aq) + e- -> Ag(s), since [Ag+] = 0.1M, Q and n will both be 0.1

The Attempt at a Solution


Honestly, this comes down to me not understanding what the terms mean. I just started electrochemistry and I haven't been able to find a decent explanation of the terms online.

I'm not sure whether I need to solve for E^{o}_{cell} (I did and got -0.982V) or E_{cell} (I got +0.202V). Solving for E^{o}_{cell} makes more sense, given my answer, since I know that silver is a poor reducing agent. It should give a negative answer of fairly high magnitude in relation to the other cells, which it did.

Basically what I'm asking is, E^{o}_{cell} is the quantity I'm looking for...right? Is E_{cell} the measured potential for a cell under non-standard conditions? Also, is my answer for E^{o}_{cell} of a reasonable magnitude? Thanks.

EDIT: Looks like my subscripts were messed up somehow. I'm pretty sure you'll be able to figure out what I meant though.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No, you are looking for Ecell of a silver half cell. E0cell you can take from standard potential tables.

Q is 0.1, that's OK, but n is not.

Once you have Ecell of silver half cell, you can calculate E for whole cell.

--
methods
 
Okay, so for the whole cell, n would be 1.1 mol then? My lab manual says that n is the total amount (in moles) of electrons transferred, so I just add the 0.1 to the 1 from the CuSO4, correct?
 
No, n is amount of electrons transferred in the half cell reaction. It is always an integer.

--
 
Ah okay, looking back on it that makes a lot more sense than what I have. Thanks a lot for the help.
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top