Net charge of a distribution that includes delta function

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a charge distribution represented by a combination of a delta function and an exponential decay term. The original poster attempts to show that this distribution has zero net charge for any given values of Z and R, while also seeking clarification on the meaning of Z in this context.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the integration of the charge density to find the net charge, with specific focus on handling the delta function in spherical coordinates. There are questions about the notation used for the delta function and whether it implies a cube or a different mathematical operation.

Discussion Status

Some participants provide guidance on switching coordinate systems to simplify the integration process. There is an ongoing exploration of the implications of the delta function's notation, with differing interpretations being discussed but no consensus reached on the original poster's confusion regarding the notation.

Contextual Notes

The original poster notes a lack of provided equations, suggesting that they may need to rely on the divergence theorem and Poisson's equation. There is also uncertainty about the correct interpretation of the delta function's notation in the context of the problem.

coaxmetal
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



show that the charge distribution ([tex]|\vec{r}|\equiv r[/tex])
[tex]\rho(r) = Z\delta^3(\vec{r})-\frac{Ze^{-r/R}}{4\pi R^2r}[/tex]
has zero net charge for any Z and R. Explain the meaning of Z.

Homework Equations



none given, but divergence (gauss) theorem and poisson's equation may be necessary.

The Attempt at a Solution



integrate to get net charge:
[tex]Q = \displaystyle\int_V \rho(\vec{r})d\tau[/tex]

I can split this into 2 integrals and use the volume element for spherical polar coordinates ([tex]d\tau = r^2dr \sin{\theta} d\theta d\varphi[/tex]), so the first integral is

[tex]\displaystyle\int_V Z\delta^3(\vec{r})r^2dr \sin{\theta} d\theta d\varphi[/tex]

This is what I get stuck on. I don't know how to handle the delta function (I assume the Dirac delta, I am given no other information) raised to a power. The fact that the volume integral is a triple integral seems like it may be important here, but I don't recall any tricks or anything about volume integrals.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
An integral of a delta function is very simple. If you get confused in spherical coords, then switch to cartesian coords for that integral. It isn't illegal to switch coordinate systems. Although the 2nd integral you will definitely want to use spherical coords. Hopefully you know the integral of a delta function in one dimension.
 
what I am having trouble with is how to integrate the cube of the delta function... Do you think it is supposed to be the third derivative, not the cube? (the notation given is exactly as shown, and to me that notation means cube). That would make more sense to me.

If it is the cube, how should I deal with it?
 
It doesn't mean cubed. Just like [tex]d^3r[/tex] in a volume integral doesn't mean cubed. It just means it is a 3-dimensional delta function. In cartesian coords it looks like:

[tex]\delta^3(\vec{r}) = \delta(x)\delta(y)\delta(z) \neq \delta(\vec{r}) \delta(\vec{r}) \delta(\vec{r})[/tex]
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K