Neutrino Electron Scattering In The Standard Model Approach

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on calculating the invariant amplitude of neutrino-electron scattering using the Standard Model approach without approximations. The invariant amplitude is expressed as $$\mathcal{M} = \mathcal{M}_W + \mathcal{M}_Z$$, with detailed formulations for both terms. The user seeks guidance on applying Fierz Rearrangement (FR) to simplify the calculation of the interference term $$2\mathcal{M}_W^*\mathcal{M}_Z$$, which remains complex due to differing Lorentz indices. The user also notes the lack of comprehensive resources on this topic, particularly those that avoid approximations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum field theory concepts, specifically Fierz Rearrangement.
  • Familiarity with the Standard Model of particle physics.
  • Knowledge of invariant amplitudes and scattering processes.
  • Proficiency in using LaTeX for mathematical expressions.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the application of Fierz Rearrangement in quantum field theory calculations.
  • Study the derivation of invariant amplitudes in neutrino scattering processes.
  • Explore advanced texts on the Standard Model, focusing on non-approximated calculations.
  • Investigate scholarly articles that discuss interference terms in particle scattering.
USEFUL FOR

Particle physicists, graduate students in quantum field theory, and researchers focused on neutrino interactions and scattering processes.

Radwan Parvez
Messages
3
Reaction score
1
Previously I posted a problem concerning Electron-neutrino scattering, but as I couldn't describe the problem clearly, so I am trying to post the problem using latex codes to present it in the correct way.

For a couple of months, I am trying to calculate the invariant amplitude of the Neutrino electron scattering in the standard model (SM) approach where I am not considering any kind of approximation (like ##q^2 << {M_W}^2## , ##m_e^2 \approx 0## etc ).

So my invariant amplitude is $$\mathcal{M} = \mathcal{M}_W + \mathcal{M}_Z$$ Hence,
\begin{align*}
|\mathcal{M}|^2 & = {\mathcal{M}}^*\mathcal{M} \\
& = (\mathcal{M}_W + \mathcal{M}_Z)^* (\mathcal{M}_W + \mathcal{M}_Z) \\
& = |\mathcal{M}_W|^2 + |\mathcal{M}_Z|^2 + 2{\mathcal{M}_W}^*\mathcal{M}_Z
\end{align*}

And
$$ \mathcal{M}_W = \frac{-g^2}{8} [\overline{\nu_e} (k^\prime) \gamma^\mu (1-\gamma^5) e(p)] \frac{g_{\mu\nu} - \frac{q_\mu q_\nu}{M_W^2}}{q^2-M_W^2} [\overline{e} (p^\prime) \gamma^\nu (1-\gamma^5) \nu_e(k)]$$
$$ \mathcal{M}_Z = \frac{-g^2}{8} [\overline{e} (p^\prime) \gamma^\mu (1-\gamma^5) e(p)] \frac{g_{\mu\nu} - \frac{q_\mu q_\nu}{M_Z^2}}{q^2-M_Z^2} [\overline{\nu_e} (k^\prime) \gamma^\nu (C_V- C_A\gamma^5) \nu_e(k)]$$

I asked my teacher and he said that I have to use Fierz Rearrangement (FR) and applying FR, I could make the ##\mathcal{M}_W## term much similar to the ##\mathcal{M}_Z## term by the expense of a minus sign.

But, Fierz Rearrangement is $$ \overline{\psi_1}\gamma^\mu (1-\gamma^5)\psi_2 \overline{\psi_3}\gamma_\mu (1-\gamma^5)\psi_4 = - \overline{\psi_3}\gamma^\mu (1-\gamma^5)\psi_2 \overline{\psi_1}\gamma_\mu (1-\gamma^5)\psi_4$$

Notice that in FR the same Lorentz index ##(\gamma^\mu and \gamma_\mu)## is in upper and lower position, but for my case, as I'm not omitting the term ##\frac{q_\mu q_\nu}{M_W^2}##, I will find one part of ##\mathcal{M}_W## to be with different Lorentz index ##(\gamma^\mu and \gamma^\nu)## both in the upper position, i.e,
\begin{align*}
\mathcal{M}_W = & -\frac{g^2}{8} [\overline{\nu_e} (k^\prime) \gamma^\mu (1-\gamma^5) e(p)] \frac{1}{q^2-M_W^2} [\overline{e} (p^\prime) \gamma_\mu (1-\gamma^5) \nu_e(k)] \\
& + \frac{g^2}{8} [\overline{\nu_e} (k^\prime) \gamma^\mu (1-\gamma^5) e(p)] \frac{q_\mu q_\nu}{M_W^2(q^2-M_W^2)} [\overline{e} (p^\prime) \gamma^\nu (1-\gamma^5) \nu_e(k)]
\end{align*}

So, How can I resolve this problem? I mean, How can I apply Fierz Rearrangement in this term?

*Nevertheless, though I can calculate the ##|\mathcal{M}_W|^2## and ##|\mathcal{M}_Z|^2## separately, I can not calculate the interference term ##2\mathcal{M}_W^*\mathcal{M}_Z## due to the same complication.

*Is there any Book or Paper on this problem? I found none. The renowned book by Gunti, "Fundamentals of Neutrino Physics and Astrophysics" also used the approximated approach where they approximate that ##q^2 << {M_W}^2,{M_Z}^2##, for which the second part doesn't appear in their calculation.I hope I described my problem clearly.

6623792828242533106
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The ##C_V## and ##C_A## in the ##\mathcal{M}_Z## should be in the electron-electron current, not in the neutrino-neutrino current. I did an unwanted mistake. But that's not what the problem is about.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K