Neutron-Electron and Neutron-Positron Interactions: Is There a Difference?

jhmar
Messages
77
Reaction score
0
I understand the difference between the two main Neutron decays but, is there an observable difference when an electron collides with a neutron compared to a positron colliding with a neutron?
In particular, I need to know if there is a difference in the behaviour of the neutron.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
When a positron collides with a neutron, "inverse beta decay" can occur.
The process is positron + neutron --> proton + antineutrino.
This can't happen when an electron interacts with a neutron.

For either positron or electron, there will be scattering from the neuton due to the neutron's magnetic dipole moment. This is the same for electron and positron.

At high momentum transfer, there will also be scattering due to the electric form factor of the neutron.

"... the two main Neutron decays" I don't know what you mean by this.
I only know one decay mode for
neutron --> proton + electron +antineutrino.
 
I only know one decay mode for
neutron --> proton + electron +antineutrino.


I read somewhere that neutron--->positron+neutrino is observed on occassions.
 
jhmar said:
I read somewhere that neutron--->positron+neutrino is observed on occassions.

But that doesn't conserve electric charge. I've never heard of a decay that does that! You must have mis-read something.
 
jtbell said:
But that doesn't conserve electric charge. I've never heard of a decay that does that! You must have mis-read something.

Nor baryon or lepton number. (Though there are searches for lepton number violation and baryone number violation, though I believe that baryon number violation has a pretty strict limit based on experiment.) The poster must just have mis-read something.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...

Similar threads

Back
Top