Neutron Stars and Special Relativity

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the relationship between neutron stars and black hole formation within the frameworks of Special Relativity and General Relativity. It specifically addresses the effects of relativistic mass increase and length contraction on a neutron star that is near the Chandrasekhar limit in its rest frame. The consensus is that the criteria for black hole formation are not met due to the nature of the stress-energy tensor, which remains consistent across different frames of reference. The conversation concludes that while the neutron star's properties change under relativistic conditions, it does not transition into a black hole.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Chandrasekhar limit in astrophysics
  • Familiarity with Einstein's equations in General Relativity
  • Knowledge of stress-energy tensors and their implications
  • Basic principles of Special Relativity, including relativistic mass and length contraction
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of the Chandrasekhar limit on stellar evolution
  • Explore Einstein's equations and their solutions in various coordinate systems
  • Investigate the concept of stress-energy tensors in General Relativity
  • Learn about the characteristics of rotating neutron stars and black holes
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, physicists, and students of astrophysics who are interested in the dynamics of neutron stars, black hole formation, and the applications of Special and General Relativity.

Hao
Messages
93
Reaction score
0
Neutron Stars and Special Relativity and General Relativity

Here is a question which I can't quite wrap my head around:

Suppose we have a Neutron Star that is borderline on the Chandrasekhar limit in its rest frame.

In another frame, the Neutron star is moving.

As a result, its density increases due to
1) Relativistic mass increase.
2) Length contraction.

So why does the Neutron star not form a black hole?

Technically, this question would apply for any object in any frame of reference that is moving sufficiently quickly.

So what am I missing here?

I suppose a general relativistic explanation is that Stress-Energy is a tensor, so matter what coordinate system you use, the criteria for black hole formation will not be met.

So,
1) Is this question well posed?
2) Where does special relativity break down?
3) Did I answer my own question?
4) What is the General Relativistic explanation?

I would like to hear your input.
Thanks.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hao said:
I suppose a general relativistic explanation is that Stress-Energy is a tensor, so matter what coordinate system you use, the criteria for black hole formation will not be met.

3) Did I answer my own question?

Yes and yes

For simplicity, consider a spherically symmetric, non-rotating neutron star its rest frame. In this coordinate system, it has a has non-zero stress-energy tensor that satisfies Einstein's equation. Boosting this stress-energy tensor produces a non-zero stress-energy tensor that is also a solution of Einstein's equation, but this boosted solution is not a black hole solution.

Now consider a spherically symmetric black hole in one of the usual coordinate systems. This is a vacuum solution to Einstein's equation, so the stress-energy tensor is identically zero. This stress-energy tensor, too, can be boosted, but the the boost of something identically zero zero is something identically zero. Boosting the stuff on the right side of Einstein's equation results, however, in a "different" looking solution to Einstein's equation, i.e., there isn't a unique vacuum solution to Einstein's equation. In this black hole situation, one of the solutions (unboosted) has (explicit) spherical symmetry and one doesn't (boosted).

Neither of the black hole solutions look like the boosted neutron star solution.

The same considerations apply to rotating neutron stars and rotating black holes. For a synopsis of boosted black holes, see

http://mwrm.wustl.edu/Presentations/akcay_sarp_win.ppt.
 
"Boosting this stress-energy tensor produces a non-zero stress-energy tensor that is also a solution of Einstein's equation, but this boosted solution is not a black hole solution..."

I don't disagree, but how do we know this is so??


Why did I also get a BBC story at this website about a Sudanese man being forced to marry a goat??
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
3K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
4K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K