New and upcoming ideas in nuclear engineering?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around new and upcoming ideas in nuclear engineering, exploring theoretical concepts such as pair production and quantum tunneling, as well as practical challenges and advancements in reactor technology. Participants are questioning the current state of the field and whether it is stagnant or evolving.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that interactions like pair production and quantum tunneling could play a role in future nuclear engineering, though practical applications remain uncertain.
  • One participant expresses skepticism about the practicality of creating electron-positron pairs for energy production, citing the high energy requirements and subsequent annihilation of positrons.
  • Challenges in materials science, such as high strength at temperature, fracture toughness, corrosion resistance, and fission product retention, are highlighted as critical areas for fission systems.
  • GenIV systems are noted as particularly challenging, and the need for commercially viable fusion energy remains a significant hurdle due to plasma stability issues.
  • Another participant emphasizes the potential of developing new reactor designs, such as High Temperature Gas Reactors (HTGR) and molten salt reactors, suggesting that current challenges are more related to material science and reactor physics than purely theoretical physics problems.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a mix of views, with some questioning the stagnation of nuclear engineering while others assert that there are indeed new ideas and challenges to explore. No consensus is reached on the practicality of certain theoretical concepts or the overall state of the field.

Contextual Notes

Participants note limitations in current nuclear engineering practices, particularly regarding material challenges and the need for advancements in reactor technology. The discussion reflects ongoing uncertainties and differing perspectives on the future direction of the field.

CherryTrooper
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
For example, what potential do interactions like pair production have in harnessing the idea of converting photons to mass have in the future of nuclear engineering? Or what about quantum tunneling as the basis of fusion/fission? is it getting cold in here, yet?

What are the new ideas out there? Or is nuke a stagnant art?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
New ideas in engineering have to justify their acceptance. They should ideally be cheaper to implement, as well as safer and more efficient than existing practice, but often just one big improvement is enough justification.
Please help us see the advantage(s) provided by the approaches you mention.
 
CherryTrooper said:
For example, what potential do interactions like pair production have in harnessing the idea of converting photons to mass have in the future of nuclear engineering? Or what about quantum tunneling as the basis of fusion/fission? is it getting cold in here, yet?
I don't see the practicality or utility of creating e-e+ pairs in large quantities. Other than high energy collisions, it takes ~1.022 MeV gamma rays to produce 1 pair, and then eventually the positron annihilates and one gets two 0.511 MeV gammas. One could produce positron emitters, but there appears no reasonable utility as an energy.

What are the new ideas out there? Or is nuke a stagnant art?
There are plenty of challenges in materials - high strength at temperature, maximal fracture toughness, corrosion resistance, fission product retention, . . . .

For fission systems, fission product disposition is a critical area.

GenIV systems are challenging.

Fusion still has to be perfected as a commercially viable energy source. Plasma stability is a challenge.

Finding a highly efficient thermal to electrical conversion system is a challenge.
 
CherryTrooper said:
For example, what potential do interactions like pair production have in harnessing the idea of converting photons to mass have in the future of nuclear engineering? Or what about quantum tunneling as the basis of fusion/fission? is it getting cold in here, yet?

What are the new ideas out there? Or is nuke a stagnant art?

There are always new ideas to be explored in nuclear engineering. The biggest area of opportunity is in developing reactors like the High Temperature Gas Reactor (HTGR) and the various types of molten salt (or liquid metal) reactors including both thermal and fast spectra. I believe you are looking for more physics problems to solve where as most current problems (in nuclear) are in the realm of material science, reactor physics, and fluids.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
7K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
11K
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
3K