psie
- 315
- 40
- Homework Statement
- As the title indicates, I'm looking for the new axis of rotation of the composite of the given two rotations in ##\mathbb R^3## below. I've worked on this exercise for hours now, but without getting the right answer: $$A=\begin{pmatrix}1&0&0\\ 0&\cos\phi&-\sin\phi\\ 0&\sin\phi &\cos\phi\end{pmatrix}\text{ and } B=\begin{pmatrix}\cos\psi&-\sin\psi&0\\ \sin\psi&\cos\psi&0\\ 0&0 &1\end{pmatrix}.$$
- Relevant Equations
- I can't think of a lot of relevant equations for this one, except that composite of rotations in ##\mathbb R^3## are rotations. Perhaps some trigonometric identities will come in handy too.
The way I've approached the problem so far is that I'm looking for the set ##\{x\in\mathbb R^3: ABx=x\}##, since the rotation acts as the identity on the axis of rotation. The set is the null space of ##AB-I##, and $$AB=\begin{pmatrix}\cos\psi&-\sin\psi&0\\ \cos\phi\sin\psi&\cos\phi\cos\psi&-\sin\phi\\ \sin\phi\sin\psi&\sin\phi\cos\psi&\cos\phi\end{pmatrix}.$$According to the answer in my book, there are 6 cases to consider:
1. makes sense since ##AB=I## in this case and any line will do. 2. also makes sense since ##AB=B## in this case and this is a rotation about the ##z##-axis. However, for the rest of them, except 5. (which geometrically makes sense too), I really struggle understanding how they reached those answers. I can't seem to find any structured way of solving this problem; it just gets very messy. What I've tried to do on paper is reduce ##AB## to row reduced echelon form, but that felt like a lot of work for nothing, since I didn't reach the answer as in the book.
EDIT: I edited a typo in the matrix of ##AB##; however, this was only a typo from typing this into the computer, not in my computations.
- Any line through the origin if ##\phi=0## and ##\psi=0##.
- The ##z##-axis if ##\phi=0## and ##\psi=\pi##.
- ##t(\cos\psi+1,-\sin\psi,0)## for ##t\in \mathbb R## if ##\phi=\pi## and ##\psi\neq\pi##.
- ##t(0,\cos\phi-1,\sin\phi)## for ##t\in\mathbb R## if ##\phi\neq\pi## and ##\psi=\pi##.
- ##t(0,1,0)## for ##t\in \mathbb R## if ##\phi=\psi=\pi##.
- ##t(\sin\phi(\cos\psi+1),-\sin\phi\sin\psi,\sin\psi(\cos\phi+1))## for ##t\in \mathbb R## otherwise.
1. makes sense since ##AB=I## in this case and any line will do. 2. also makes sense since ##AB=B## in this case and this is a rotation about the ##z##-axis. However, for the rest of them, except 5. (which geometrically makes sense too), I really struggle understanding how they reached those answers. I can't seem to find any structured way of solving this problem; it just gets very messy. What I've tried to do on paper is reduce ##AB## to row reduced echelon form, but that felt like a lot of work for nothing, since I didn't reach the answer as in the book.
EDIT: I edited a typo in the matrix of ##AB##; however, this was only a typo from typing this into the computer, not in my computations.
Last edited: