New Category wanted (needed?): Philosophy of Physics

  • Thread starter Thread starter Buckethead
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the suggestion to create a new forum category for the Philosophy of Physics, inspired by the book "Introduction to The Philosophy of Physics" by Marc Lange. Proposed topics include the reality of magnetic fields, the nature of time, and the implications of time travel. However, there is significant opposition to this idea, citing concerns about the difficulty of moderating philosophical discussions and the tendency for such topics to lead to unresolvable debates. Critics argue that philosophy can devolve into unscientific speculation, which detracts from the forum's focus on empirical evidence. Overall, the consensus leans against establishing a philosophy category due to these challenges.
Buckethead
Gold Member
Messages
560
Reaction score
38
I have just recently been introduced to a really terrific book called "Introduction to The Philosophy of Physics" by Marc Lange and it has opened up a lot of great avenues of thought for me and was thinking it would be equally terrific to have a category available in this forum to discuss such matters. Typical topics might include if magnetic fields are real or just mathematical, spaciotemporal locality, what is the actual nature of time, is time travel into the past really meaningful, and so on. What does everyone think?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Opening up PF to discussions of woo under the guise of philosophy would be a mistake.
 
  • Like
Likes RaulTheUCSCSlug
Philosophy topics give me hives. I know that there is some legitimate philosophy in the community, but in practice it is impossible to moderate well.
 
  • Like
Likes RaulTheUCSCSlug
The problem with philosophy questions of this sort is that there is no way to test any answers by experiment. So discussions of these topics inevitably become endless threads of people restating their positions with no resolution. I'd prefer to stick to topics where there is at least some chance of figuring out who is right and who is wrong.
 
Buckethead said:
I have just recently been introduced to a really terrific book called "Introduction to The Philosophy of Physics" by Marc Lange and it has opened up a lot of great avenues of thought for me and was thinking it would be equally terrific to have a category available in this forum to discuss such matters. Typical topics might include if magnetic fields are real or just mathematical, spaciotemporal locality, what is the actual nature of time, is time travel into the past really meaningful, and so on. What does everyone think?
NO. We recently closed the philosophy forum due to this kind of crackpottery.
 
I want to thank those members who interacted with me a couple of years ago in two Optics Forum threads. They were @Drakkith, @hutchphd, @Gleb1964, and @KAHR-Alpha. I had something I wanted the scientific community to know and slipped a new idea in against the rules. Thank you also to @berkeman for suggesting paths to meet with academia. Anyway, I finally got a paper on the same matter as discussed in those forum threads, the fat lens model, got it peer-reviewed, and IJRAP...
About 20 years ago, in my mid-30s (and with a BA in economics and a master's in business), I started taking night classes in physics hoping to eventually earn the science degree I'd always wanted but never pursued. I found physics forums and used it to ask questions I was unable to get answered from my textbooks or class lectures. Unfortunately, work and life got in the way and I never got further the freshman courses. Well, here it is 20 years later. I'm in my mid-50s now, and in a...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
355
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
519
Replies
26
Views
6K
Replies
21
Views
4K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
3K
Back
Top