New effect of electromagnetism discovered?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Hawksteinman
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electromagnetism
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a recent claim of a "new effect" in electromagnetism, which some participants argue is not a genuine discovery but rather a new application of established principles from Maxwell's theory. While the experimental work may be innovative, it does not contradict existing theories, which are highly accurate. The conversation highlights that the realization of this application took 150 years, emphasizing the importance of practical implementation over theoretical novelty. Participants also draw parallels between this new application and existing concepts like the "magnetic bottle." Overall, the consensus leans towards viewing it as an advancement in application rather than a breakthrough in physics.
Physics news on Phys.org
Why should this be "a new effect"? It's all well understood within good old Maxwell's theory. So it's not new. Maybe the work done with this kind of trap is new, but not the basic principles. It would rather be a mindblowing discovery if something electromagnetical would be discovered that contradicts Maxwell's theory, which in its quantum version is among the most accurate ever discovered physical theories of mankind!
 
  • Like
Likes thomas19981, Hawksteinman and Charles Link
I think it's more accurate to say a new application has been discovered, but not any new physics.

Pretty cool that this was the basis of an experimental exercise in the most recent International Physics Olympiad. :-)
 
  • Like
Likes OmCheeto, vanhees71, jerromyjon and 1 other person
vanhees71 said:
Why should this be "a new effect"? It's all well understood within good old Maxwell's theory.
It only took 150 years to realize this new application. :-P The plausibility of the effect might have been well understood but it's applicability has finally been realized. Is this similar to a "magnetic bottle" in 3 dimensions as this is 1 dimension?
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71
Sure, I don't want to diminish the realization of this new kind of trap, but it's wrong to claim that it's a "new effect". The original paper by the authors is marvelous to read (also download the supplement):

http://aip.scitation.org/doi/abs/10.1063/1.4978876

You can understand the theory treated in this paper after a good course on classical electrodynamics (perhaps after reading a bit about the method of conformal mappings for 2D static em. fields).
 
  • Like
Likes jerromyjon and Hawksteinman
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top