New Results From LHC/ light speed project

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on the validity of claims regarding faster-than-light particles, specifically referencing a BBC article. Participants express skepticism, suggesting that the evidence presented is likely a measurement error rather than a groundbreaking discovery. The consensus indicates that the implications of such findings would be significant, but current discussions lean towards the idea that the results are not credible. Additionally, users are encouraged to refer to existing threads for more comprehensive insights on the topic.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of particle physics concepts
  • Familiarity with the Large Hadron Collider (LHC)
  • Knowledge of measurement error in scientific experiments
  • Basic grasp of special relativity and its implications
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of special relativity and its limitations
  • Explore measurement error analysis in experimental physics
  • Investigate previous claims of faster-than-light particles and their outcomes
  • Read about the Large Hadron Collider's role in particle physics research
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, educators teaching advanced physics concepts, and researchers interested in particle physics and experimental validation.

brother time
Messages
45
Reaction score
0
Just wondering people's opinions if this is true?

Is it enough evidence to conclude this (not yet obviously), but do you feel the evidence might be valid?

Lastly what would be the implications if it was true?



http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-15017484


I was also wondering if anyone had any articles related to near/ faster than light particles, I might do this for my Physics 11 class (grade 11 physics). I have had a fairly educated backgroud in this area through personal study and will recognize most of the formulas.

Any input would be appreciated,

BT
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
There is already a thread on this topic and the mods will presumably lock this one and point you to the other one.

The consensus is that this will prove to be measurement error.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
7K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 72 ·
3
Replies
72
Views
8K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
6K