New Star Squirts Water From Poles

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dotini
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Poles Star Water
AI Thread Summary
A recent study published in Astronomy & Astrophysics reveals that ESA’s Herschel Space Observatory has detected a young sun-like star, located 750 light-years away, ejecting water at speeds of 124,000 miles per hour. The discussion raises questions about whether all protostars exhibit similar behavior and the role of oxygen in star formation. It is suggested that the ejected material consists of atoms that form water, rather than liquid water itself, as they are heated and then expelled from the star's poles. The formation of stars involves the accretion of dust and particles, with excess material being expelled into space, although the exact mechanisms behind this process remain unclear. The findings highlight the complexities of star formation and the ongoing exploration of astrophysical phenomena.
Dotini
Gold Member
Messages
634
Reaction score
231
A study, accepted for publication in the journal Astronomy & Astrophysics, says ESA’s Herschel Space Observatory has spotted a young sun-like star 750 light-years from Earth that is shooting water from its poles at about 124,000 miles per hour.

I wonder, do all protostars do this? Is oxygen always part of star formation? Are Neptune and Uranus water planets?

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2011/06/110613-space-science-star-water-bullets-kristensen/

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/06/17/star-shooting-water-jets-herschel_n_879211.html

http://www.popsci.com/technology/ar...pewing-water-jets-interstellar-space?cmpid=tw

Respectfully submitted,
Steve
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
I'd say it depends on the makeup of the nebula that exists before it collapses into a star. If it has enough oxygen, sure. If not, then no.
 
I'm not an astrophysicist but this just seems outrageous. By what mechanism could liquid water ever exist in such proximity to any star let alone be ejected from it?
 
If it is stripping water-ice from proto-planetary nebula then ejecting that as protons and hydroxyl ions, no surprise there. If they cool and recombine, there'd be a haze of molecular-scale ice crystals again...
 
Antiphon said:
I'm not an astrophysicist but this just seems outrageous. By what mechanism could liquid water ever exist in such proximity to any star let alone be ejected from it?

Did you read the article? The oxygen and hydrogen were pulled in, heated and then forced out of the poles where they recombined once they cooled off. The "water" isn't really being ejected, but the atoms that form water are. It all depends on how you look at it I guess.
 
There is apparently no self-consistent theory that can explain what we are seeing.

http://www.physorg.com/news/2011-06-baby-star-blasts-jets-space.html

Lars E. Kristensen, a postdoctoral student at the Leiden University in the Netherlands, an author of the paper, said that all stars are formed by the accretion of dust and other particles in interstellar space and are eventually surrounded by a disk of material that falls into the star as it builds.

The disks are something like the rings of Saturn but far less well-defined, he said, "more puffy."

Material that is not used by the forming star is blasted back out into space from the poles, perpendicular to the angle of the disks.

"We don’'t know the launching point or the exact launching mechanism," Kristensen said. "There is no self-consistent theory that can explain what we are seeing."


Respectfully,
Steve
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...

Similar threads

Back
Top