New User of Xfoil: Adjusting Measured Cp for Data Match

  • Thread starter Thread starter micheljoel200
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on a new user's challenge in aligning measured pressure coefficient (Cp) data from wind tunnel experiments with simulation results from Xfoil. The user seeks guidance on correcting their measured Cp to achieve a match. Key insights reveal that discrepancies may arise from tunnel wall effects and blockage, necessitating adjustments to the dynamic pressure measurements. The user is advised to consult "Low Speed Wind Tunnel Testing" by Pope for detailed correction methods.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of pressure coefficient (Cp) in fluid dynamics
  • Familiarity with wind tunnel testing principles
  • Knowledge of dynamic pressure measurement techniques
  • Basic experience with Xfoil simulation software
NEXT STEPS
  • Study "Low Speed Wind Tunnel Testing" by Pope for correction techniques
  • Research methods for correcting dynamic pressure for blockage effects
  • Explore advanced Xfoil features for improved simulation accuracy
  • Investigate experimental setup optimization for wind tunnel tests
USEFUL FOR

Aerospace engineers, wind tunnel technicians, and researchers involved in aerodynamic testing and simulation who seek to improve the accuracy of their experimental data against computational models.

micheljoel200
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
i'm a new user of xfoil. I make measurements (Cp) in wind tunnel. But my measured data don't match with the data of xfoil. I use xfoil like my reference.

Which correction can i bring to my measured Cp so that measured and simualation data match together?

Cp = pressure coefficient

thanks

MJ
 
Engineering news on Phys.org


Why do you think that your measures Cp is wrong? It may be that xfoil is not perfect, after all, it is an inviscid panel code with various viscous corrections that can be implemented.

Otherwise it's hard to say much without knowing more about your experiments.
 


some reports compare their measured data with simulation data, and they match very well. But before comparaison they brought some correction of their measured data. The problem is that they don't explain very well what they did.
That is why i'searching now for a very example where almost everything is explain. May be someone can help me here.

thx
 


Again, the problem isn't necessarily experimental. It very well may be, but no one can help you unless you explain your experimental setup a little bit. For example, details of the wind tunnel, te model, your measurement techniques, etc.
 


My wind tunnel has following measure: L= 123 cm, b=61cm, H=31cm.
in the attachment the blue curvature ist from xfoil and the red curvature is from my measurement. There is an offset between the both curvature, i don't know why. I read in book that to match them i need to correct my measured data. But i don't how i can do that.

Please help me.

thx
 

Attachments



Assuming you have done nothing wrong with your experiment the correction you need to apply is due to tunnel wall effects. To correct the pressure coefficient you have to correct the dynamic pressure for blockage effects. When you place a model in a tunnel you reduce the effective area through which the air can flow and because mass must be conserved the air will speed up. A similar effect is caused by the wake of your model. You probably measure dynamic pressure upstream of your model so the dynamic pressure your model is experiencing is different from what you measure, therefore you have to correct for it. I will not go into how to do this because it would take to long but you should look at "Low Speed Wind Tunnel Testing" by Pope.

However after looking at your data I can tell you that your only problem is not the blockage effects I just explained, unless your model is really big relative to your tunnel in which case you shouldn't be using that model. The difference between your data and xfoil is too large for it to only be blockage effects. So you either did something wrong in your experiment or xfoil.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
13K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
6K
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
6K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K