Spaceship Observations in Relativity: A Newbie's Question

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter adimare
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Relativity
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the relativistic velocity addition as observed between two spaceships, A and B, each moving at 0.75c relative to an observer. The correct formula for calculating the relative velocity of spaceship B as perceived by spaceship A is given by the relativistic velocity addition formula: w = (u + v) / (1 + uv/c²), resulting in a relative speed of approximately 0.96c. Participants emphasize the importance of understanding this formula to accurately interpret the behavior of objects moving at significant fractions of the speed of light.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of special relativity concepts
  • Familiarity with the relativistic velocity addition formula
  • Basic knowledge of Lorentz transformations
  • Ability to interpret space-time diagrams
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the relativistic velocity addition formula in detail
  • Explore Lorentz transformations and their applications
  • Learn about space-time diagrams and their significance in relativity
  • Investigate the implications of velocities approaching the speed of light
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, particularly those interested in special relativity, as well as educators and anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of relativistic motion and velocity perception in different reference frames.

adimare
Messages
23
Reaction score
1
Hello everyone, great to meet you all.

My name is Alejandro Di Mare, a computer science bachelor from Costa Rica currently studying music in Pasadena, California. For the past few months physics have captured my attention so greatly I'm thinking about persuing a masters degree in the subject next year (I hope I'll eventually be able to help people in this forum instead of asking simple SR questions :P).

I've been reading a few posts on relativity trying to find if this has been addressed, but was unable to find it (I'm pretty sure someone must have asked this to you guys/girls, so I apologize if I force you to repeat yourselves).

I am observing 2 spaceships, A and B. Relative to me, A moves to my left at a speed of 0.75c, B moves to my right at a speed of 0.75c. I'm wondering if one of you guys/girls could explain me how a passenger in spaceship A perceives spaceship B and what results he would obtain in an attempt to meassure it's speed (in a reference frame where A is stationary.).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Alejandro, welcome to PF :)

Have a read of this FAQ about relativistic velocity addition and see if it helps. Sorry for being lazy, but if you are still stuck, feel free to ask for further explanations/ clarifications ;)


Here is the link I left out :O --> http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Relativity/SR/velocity.html
 
Last edited:
Welcome to PF!

Hi Alejandro! Welcome to PF! :smile:

In your example, we apply the rule for combining velocities: (u + v)/(1 + uv/c²).

With u = v = .75c, that gives 1.5c/(25/16), = 0.96c. :smile:

For more details, see wikipedia (which is very good on physics) …

 
I'm also going to give you the short version of the answer hoping that you will ask additional questions if you aren't completely satisfied:
from the point of view of A (in which A is stationary), B is moving past it at high velocity. To find that velocity, one should add both speeds, using the relativistic formula,
w = \frac{u + v}{1 + u v / c^2}[/tex]<br /> which gives back the standard formula <i>w = u + v</i> when <i>u</i> and <i>v</i> are much smaller than <i>c</i>. You can just use this formula to calculate the velocity of B, according to A (and will get something around 0.96<i>c</i>, rather than 1.5<i>c</i>).<br /> <br /> [edit]tiny-tim beat me... by a lot even (did it take me so long to type that short answer?)[/edit]
 
ah, beautiful, just what I was looking for, for some reason I'm able to picture the addition of velocities with frames that are approaching each other (or the typical example of a guy walking on a train, it's not difficult to invision the length contractions that make sense of the adddition of velocities) but I'm still having trouble seeing it with reference frames moving away from each other :P. Thanks for the help :cool:
 
Last edited:
adimare said:
ah, beautiful, just what I was looking for, for some reason I'm able to picture the addition of velocities with frames that are approaching each other (or the typical example of a guy walking on a train, it's not difficult to invision the length contractions that make sense of the adddition of velocities) but I'm still having trouble seeing it with reference frames moving away from each other :P. Thanks for the help :cool:

If it helps any, the velocity that A sees B aproaching at, is exactly the same as the velocity of B that he measures when they are going away from each other (except for the sign).
 
Is it safe for me (the observer that sees each ship moving in opposite directions at 0.75c) to say that they're moving away from each other at a speed greater than c?
I made the space-time diagram and see no problems with this affirmation, hope you can check it out and tell me if there's anything wrong with it :P

The ships are moving away from each other with an angle of 60° (greater than 45°, which to my understanding would mean they're moving away from each other at c.). Of course I understand that if we rotate the diagram using Lorentz transformations to see how the same situation looks using spaceship A as the reference frame spaceship B's line would not be at an angle greater than 45° from spaceship A's line.
 

Attachments

  • spaceships.GIF
    spaceships.GIF
    3.8 KB · Views: 489
nevermind that last post, I just read ht tp://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Relativity/SpeedOfLight/FTL.html and confirmed what I thought :P
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 59 ·
2
Replies
59
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
4K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
4K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
5K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
5K