Newtonian & Einstein Quantum Mechanics

AI Thread Summary
Newtonian physics operates on the principle of absolute speed, suggesting that if an object travels at a certain speed, the speed of light can be added to it, leading to contradictions. In contrast, Einstein's theory of relativity establishes that the speed of light is constant and dependent on the observer's frame of reference, resolving these paradoxes. The discussion highlights the importance of understanding both Newton's and Einstein's contributions to quantum mechanics, particularly in how they redefine concepts of speed and motion. Resources like NOVA's "The Elegant Universe" are recommended for further exploration of these topics. A solid grasp of introductory physics texts is also suggested for a deeper understanding.
usnpilot2012
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I have a paper due Friday in ap Physics and i can't seem to find anything on the subject that doesn't involve reading an entire textbook. Ok so we first must compare/contrast Newtonian & Einstein Physics, then explain their contributions to Quantum mechanics.

The Attempt at a Solution



so i know about the 4th dimension, and that somehow Einstein's general relativity and Newtons model somehow are different. any help would be great i love physics but unfortuanately my teacher is a better babysitter than teacher.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You may want to be careful about insulting your teacher - many of us contributors are physics teachers!

Maybe you could start with this: If a ship was traveling 300 million meters per second, and shined a flashlight beam out in front (light travels at 300 million m/s) then Newtonian mechanics says the "absolute" speed of the light beam would be 300 + 300 = 600 million m/s. But light never travels faster than 300 million m/s. Einstein's mechanics resolved this paradox. One of the results, for example, says that there is no such thing as an "absolute" speed; speed always depends on who's measuring.

NOVA has an online show called "The Elegant Universe" and the first couple chapters have some good comparisons between Newt and Ein.

To get any better than that, you will need to read a lot. Maybe not an entire textbook, but at least get your intro textbook and read the sections on Relativity and Quantum.
 
merryjman said:
NOVA has an online show called "The Elegant Universe" and the first couple chapters have some good comparisons between Newt and Ein.

You can watch it here.
 
sorry i didn't mean to insult him i just get upset when my potential is thwarted, especially since i love physics

thanks for the help. =)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Replies
48
Views
4K
Replies
23
Views
5K
Replies
39
Views
7K
Replies
5
Views
882
Replies
9
Views
809
Replies
3
Views
3K
Back
Top