Newtonian space in modern physics

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the concept of bending space in modern physics, comparing it to Newtonian ideas of absolute space. It clarifies that modern physics understands bending space as "intrinsic bending" or "curvature," which aligns with the principles of relativity. While Newtonian concepts of space and time have largely been abandoned, they remain useful for practical applications, such as engineering projects like bridge construction. Using relativity for such calculations would complicate processes without providing significant benefits. Overall, the conversation highlights the transition from Newtonian physics to modern theories while acknowledging the continued relevance of Newtonian principles in specific contexts.
thinkandmull
Messages
51
Reaction score
0
I asked one time on this forum about bending space. If I take a paperback book and understand it as space instead of matter, and then bend it, it seems that the bent space moves into other space and that there is space from which it came. Now the idea didn't make any sense to me. Someone clarified for me that in modern physics bending space is an "intrinsic bending" or "curvature". That made a lot of sense to me. However, does modern science use the Newtonian idea of external space? Or has that idea been left into history? Thanks. The history of physics is very interesting for me.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The Newtonian concepts of absolute space and time have been abandoned in favour of Relativity. That doesn't mean that Newtonian concepts are not useful in certain circumstances, they can still be used for many calculations within their domain of applicability.
 
Newtonian concepts still work fine for projects such as say building a bridge.
Using relativity to do something like that would result in a lot of unnecessary calculating which would make no difference to the bridge.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top