Newton's II frcitionless surface, constant velocity, angle of incline

AI Thread Summary
A physics student analyzes a puck's motion on a frictionless air hockey table, observing a drift of 2.47 cm while maintaining a constant velocity of 3.79 m/s over a distance of 1.84 m. She deduces that the table is inclined and calculates the angle of inclination using the relationship between the drift distance and gravitational acceleration. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding the acceleration components in different dimensions and applying Newton's second law to solve the problem. Participants highlight the need to break down the problem into manageable parts and correctly apply the relevant equations. Overall, the conversation focuses on clarifying the mathematical relationships involved in analyzing motion on an inclined surface.
freq_mod
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A physics student playing with an air hockey table (a frictionless surface) finds that if she gives the puck a velocity of 3.79 m/s along the length ( 1.84 m) of the table at one end, by the time it has reached the other end the puck has drifted a distance 2.47 cm to the right but still has a velocity component along the length of 3.79 m/s. She concludes correctly that the table is not level and correctly calculates its inclination from the above information.


Homework Equations



x=x0+vx0t+1/2at2, since acceleration is constant
\SigmaFy=ma



The Attempt at a Solution



vx0=3.8m/s
x=1.75m, x0=0
vx=x/t

y=.025m

This is as far as I get. Setting up the problem is my main issue with this.I actually know the answer to this because I purchased the solutions manual. But, I do not understand it. Working on my own, I am still unclear about the mathematical relationship between this problem and Newton's II.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF.

You know the time that it drifts by is 1.84/3.79 seconds.

So using that time and the drift ...

.0247 m = 1/2*a*t2

The angle then you know from gravity makes a = g*sinθ
 
Thanks...i appreciate the help. it's starting to make sense. You are using the acceleration of g and the lateral acceleration of the drift to find the angle. Then substituting those values into the constant acceleration equation. Hopefully, I will get to the point where I'm able to make these connections between equations.
 
freq_mod said:
Thanks...i appreciate the help. it's starting to make sense. You are using the acceleration of g and the lateral acceleration of the drift to find the angle. Then substituting those values into the constant acceleration equation. Hopefully, I will get to the point where I'm able to make these connections between equations.

There's no real trick to it. The vertical dimension is accelerated. The horizontal ones are not, as long as you are moving along equipotential surfaces, i.e. like at the same height. Time of course runs the same in all dimensions. The rest is just breaking things down and applying the proper considerations and solving for what you need.

Regardless though Good luck with it.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top