Newton's law, normal force, acceleration

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a person standing on a bathroom scale in an elevator, with a focus on normal force, weight, and acceleration. The scenario presents a potential misunderstanding regarding the acceleration value provided in the problem statement.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the forces acting on the person and the calculations involved in determining the normal force. There is a question about the realism of the acceleration value given, with suggestions to reconsider it.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of the problem's parameters, particularly the acceleration value. Some participants express uncertainty about the correctness of the calculations based on the provided data, while others affirm that the approach taken appears valid.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the discrepancy in the acceleration value, with one suggesting it may be a typographical error. The discussion reflects a concern about the reliability of the source material, as it has been edited multiple times over the years.

jehan4141
Messages
90
Reaction score
0
A 75 kg person is standing on a bathroom scale in an elevator. The scale is calibrated to read in Newtons. The elevator is accelerating upward at 135 m/s2. What is the reading on the scale? What apparent value of g does the man give?



The Free Body Diagram
Normal on the man, upward
Weight mg of the man, downward



My Attempt/Logic
The only two forces acting on the man are normal force and weight.

FN - mg = ma
fN = mg + ma, where N is the reading on the scale.

FN = (75)(9.8) + (75)(135)
FN = 10860 N

The solution reads 8.5x102 N? Am I doing something wrong? This problem seems very basic, but I am obviously missing something.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you sure the acceleration wasn't 1.35 m/s^2. 135 m/s^2 is not very realistic.
 
It is much closer with 1.35 m/s2, However it is still a little off? I am not sure if there is even anything wrong with the way I am doing it :( it seems correct?
 
jehan4141 said:
It is much closer with 1.35 m/s2, However it is still a little off?
If you take g = 10 m/s^2 it's pretty close. (But it definitely says 135 m/s^2.)
I am not sure if there is even anything wrong with the way I am doing it :( it seems correct?
Your work is perfectly fine, and given the data, so is your answer.
 
Thank you so much! It's very surprising that the solution could be wrong because if you read the preface of the packet it says that this learning guide has been edited many times over the course of many decades!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 95 ·
4
Replies
95
Views
7K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K