Newton's Law of Temperature Change Differential

Manni
Messages
42
Reaction score
0
I'm a bit confused as to what I do next with this problem.

Consider the initial value problem [itex]\frac{dy}{dx}[/itex] = a(y-b) where y(0) = y0

With a > 0, b = 0, it represents exponential growth, while a < 0, b = 0 gives exponential decay. With y = T, a = -k, k = TA and y0=T0 it gives Newton's Law of Temperature Change,

[itex]\frac{dy}{dx}[/itex] = -k(T - TA)

Solve the given model and give a qualitative sketch for each of the cases 1) a > 0 and 2) a < 0. You may assume b ≥ 0. Include y0= b as one typical solution for each.

So what I did was I applied the integral to both sides of [itex]\frac{dy}{dx}[/itex] = -k(T - TA) yielding,

1 = -k ∫ (T - TA)

But I don't know how to integrate TA
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You can't integrate both sides because you have no differential on the right. Part of your problem is that you say y= T but then leave y in the equation.
Write the equation as [itex]\frac{dT}{dx}= -k(T- T_A)[/itex], then as
[tex]\frac{dT}{T- T_A}= -kdx[/tex]
and integrate. TA is a constant. To integrate on the left, let u= T- TA so that du= dT.
 
Manni said:
I'm a bit confused as to what I do next with this problem.

Consider the initial value problem [itex]\frac{dy}{dx}[/itex] = a(y-b) where y(0) = y0

With a > 0, b = 0, it represents exponential growth, while a < 0, b = 0 gives exponential decay. With y = T, a = -k, k = TA and y0=T0 it gives Newton's Law of Temperature Change,

[itex]\frac{dy}{dx}[/itex] = -k(T - TA)

Solve the given model and give a qualitative sketch for each of the cases 1) a > 0 and 2) a < 0. You may assume ≥ 0. Include y0= b as one typical solution for each.







So what I did was I applied the integral to both sides of [itex]\frac{dy}{dx}[/itex] = -k(T - TA) yielding,

1 = -k ∫ (T - TA)

But I don't know how to integrate TA

I think you are mis-reading the problem. It says to solve the given model, and to look at the cases a > 0 and a < 0, etc. To me, that says solve dy/dx = a*(y-b) [= the given model], so there is no "T" involved.

RGV
 
Oh, so we would integrate the constant b as a normal constant correct? I.e. b*x?
 
Not when it is in the denominator! Use the substitution u= T- TA as I suggested.
 
Oh I understand, thank you!
 
Wait, it's dT/dt not dT/dx?
 
The only thing I'm not sure of is if it the question is asking for solutions. If it is can I put the dy/dx equation in the standard differential form,

dy/dx + P(x) = Q(x)

Then, I can determine the integrating factor and solve that way. I was initially thinking of doing that, would it work?
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K