Newton's Second Law for Rotation

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a pulley with a specified rotational inertia and radius, subjected to a time-varying tangential force. The original poster seeks to determine the angular acceleration and angular speed at a specific time, given the changing nature of the applied force.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the application of kinematic equations, questioning their validity due to the non-constant nature of angular acceleration. There is exploration of the relationship between angular acceleration and angular speed, with suggestions of using integration to find a function for angular acceleration over time.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on the need to express angular acceleration as a function of time rather than using a single value at a specific moment. There is recognition of the complexity introduced by the changing force and torque, leading to ongoing exploration of the correct approach to find angular speed.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the challenge of integrating without a clear variable relationship and the need to reconcile the provided force function with the equations of motion. There is also mention of textbook answers that may not align with the reasoning discussed in the thread.

frig0018
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A pulley, with a rotational inertia of 1.0 x 10^-3 kg*m^2 about its axle and a radius of 10 cm, is acted on tangentially at its rim. the force magnitude varies in time as F=0.50t + 0.30t^2, with F in Newtons and t in seconds. The pulley is initially at rest . At t=3.0 s what are its (a) angular acceleration and (b) its angular speed?


Homework Equations



(a) [tex]\alpha[/tex]= (r*F(3)) / I = 420 rad/sec^2
(b) unsure, but tried using [tex]\omega[/tex]= [tex]\omega[/tex][tex]_{}0[/tex] +[tex]\alpha[/tex]t = 1260 rad/s which is wrong and several other variations of that equation.

The Attempt at a Solution



(see above)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The kinematic equation you used is incorrect because this is only for cases of constant alpha. In this case, since force is changing, torque is changing. And since torque is changing, alpha is changing. Think of the general (geometric?) relationship between alpha and omega.
 
so is the geometric relationship that when alpha increases, so does omega? do i need to use an integral?
dw= (integral)alpha dt? but how can i differentiate this if there are no variables?
i come up with dw=alpha*t + c but when i plug in t=3, i still get 1260...
 
Hi frig0018,

alpha is not 420 rad/s^2 except at t=3. To integrate over t you need alpha as a function of (the variable) t.
 
they are just asking for alpha at t=3 s, which is 420 rad/s^2. I am fairly sure of this because it is the answer in the back of the book... However, i am struggling to figure out omega at t=3 s which should be 500 rad/s but i need the work to back it up and I'm not sure which equations to use.
 
Your method for obtaining the alpha at t=3 is correct, and your idea of integrating is also correct, it seems you're just stuck on finding the function? Well, look at the way in which you solved for alpha and you'll see you have a general formula for alpha. That should help :)
 
frig0018 said:
they are just asking for alpha at t=3 s, which is 420 rad/s^2. I am fairly sure of this because it is the answer in the back of the book... However, i am struggling to figure out omega at t=3 s which should be 500 rad/s but i need the work to back it up and I'm not sure which equations to use.

Yes, your answer for part a looks correct, but my previous comment:

alphysicist said:
Hi frig0018,

alpha is not 420 rad/s^2 except at t=3. To integrate over t you need alpha as a function of (the variable) t.

was referring to part b. In post #3 you tried to integrate (alpha dt), with the integral running from t=0 to t=3. But if you integrate from t=0 to t=3, you can't just plug in the value of alpha that is true only at t=3. You need alpha as a function of t.

They give you the force as a function of t: F= 0.50t + 0.30t^2. What is alpha as a function of t?
 

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
Replies
44
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K