Newton's Second Law of Motion -- Three masses, an inclined plane and a pulley

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on applying Newton's Second Law of Motion to a problem involving three masses, an inclined plane, and a pulley system. Participants analyze the forces acting on the masses, particularly the tension and gravitational forces, and derive equations to calculate maximum acceleration. Key equations discussed include F = m*a and the relationship between the forces acting on the system, specifically T = (m1 + m2) * g * sin(16). The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the net forces and acceleration relationships in the system.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's Second Law of Motion
  • Familiarity with basic physics concepts such as force, mass, and acceleration
  • Knowledge of trigonometric functions, particularly sine and cosine
  • Ability to analyze forces in a pulley system
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of equations for systems involving pulleys and inclined planes
  • Learn about friction coefficients and their impact on motion
  • Explore advanced applications of Newton's Laws in multi-body systems
  • Investigate the effects of different angles of inclination on acceleration
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, educators teaching mechanics, and anyone interested in understanding the dynamics of pulley systems and inclined planes.

  • #31
haruspex said:
As you correctly stated in post #28, the forces that act on M are gravity and the tension. Those are the only forces that should appear in the equation. Yes, it may turn out that the tension is equal to ##(m_1+m_2)*g*\sin(16) ##, but take it one step at a time.
And think about the way each force acts on M.
T= ##(m_1+m_2)*g*\sin(16) ##
Gravity = M*g
Tension and Gravity are opposite forces. So we should consider the Gravity negative?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
mustafamistik said:
T= ##(m_1+m_2)*g*\sin(16) ##
Gravity = M*g
Tension and Gravity are opposite forces. So we should consider the Gravity negative?
It doesn't matter which direction you take as positive as long as you are consistent. The important point is that tension and gravity are acting in opposite directions
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: mustafamistik
  • #33
PeroK said:
It doesn't matter which direction you take as positive as long as you are consistent. The important point is that tension and gravity are acting in opposite directions
I get it thanks sir. But i don't know how to calculate max M still.
 
  • #34
mustafamistik said:
I get it thanks sir. But i don't know how to calculate max M still.
Let's take a step back. If there is no slipping between ##m_1## and ##m_2##, then we have a simple pulley system with a mass ##M## pulling a mass ##m_1 + m_2## up a slope.

Can you calculate the acceleration of the system?
 
  • #35
Using ##F=m*a##;
##M*g-(m_1+m_2)*sin(16)*g/(M+m_1+m_2)=a##
 
  • #36
mustafamistik said:
Using ##F=m*a##;
##M*g-(m_1+m_2)*sin(16)*g/(M+m_1+m_2)=a##
You might need to tidy that up a bit. And check you aren't missing some brackets.

What does that tell you about the acceleration of ##m_1##?
 
  • #37
PeroK said:
You might need to tidy that up a bit. And check you aren't missing some brackets.

What does that tell you about the acceleration of ##m_1##?
You are right.
##(M*g-(m_1+m_2)*sin(16)*g)/(M+m_1+m_2)=a##
=> ##(g*(M-(m_1+m_2)*sin(16)))##
a is acceleration of the all system.
 
  • #38
mustafamistik said:
You are right.
##(M*g-(m_1+m_2)*sin(16)*g)/(M+m_1+m_2)=a##
=> ##(g*(M-(m_1+m_2)*sin(16)))##
a is acceleration of the all system.
And there's an upper limit on ##a##, correct? Depending on ##\mu##?
 
  • #39
PeroK said:
And there's an upper limit on ##a##, correct? Depending on ##\mu##?
This is the point where I stuck.
 
  • #40
mustafamistik said:
This is the point where I stuck.
I don't know what you mean. You did that already:

mustafamistik said:
This equation to find maximum acceleration. (m2*g*cos(16)* μ) -(m2*g*sin(16))=m2*a (F=ma)

Maybe it was so long ago!
 
  • #41
PeroK said:
I don't know what you mean. You did that already:
Maybe it was so long ago!
Is that equation true ?
 
  • #42
mustafamistik said:
Is that equation true ?
I think so. You just have to put everything together now.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: mustafamistik
  • #43
PeroK said:
I think so. You just have to put everything together now.
Thank you and @haruspex for helping solve and understand this question. Also thanks for your interest.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K