Newton's second law -- rockets

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the application of Newton's second law in the context of rocket motion, particularly addressing the apparent contradiction between zero net external force and the acceleration of the rocket. Participants explore the implications of defining the system and the role of momentum conservation in understanding rocket dynamics.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions how force can equal zero if there is acceleration, indicating a potential misunderstanding of the system's definition.
  • Another participant clarifies that by considering both the rocket and its propellant as part of the same system, the net external force can be zero, leading to internal forces causing acceleration in opposite directions.
  • A different viewpoint suggests that the "new form" of Newton's second law presented is not universally valid and is only applicable in specific scenarios, emphasizing the importance of conservation of momentum instead.
  • Some participants point out potential errors in the original formulation of Newton's second law as applied to rockets, including confusion over variable definitions and assumptions about mass changes.
  • One participant asserts that the system's acceleration is zero, as the rocket and propellant accelerate in opposite directions, challenging the initial premise of acceleration.
  • Another participant advocates for using momentum conservation as a more robust framework than the force paradigm, suggesting that it resolves many issues related to the derivation of the rocket equation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the validity of the application of Newton's second law in this context, with some advocating for momentum conservation as a clearer approach. The discussion remains unresolved, with multiple competing interpretations of the concepts involved.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on definitions of the system, assumptions about mass changes during rocket operation, and the specific conditions under which the discussed equations hold true. There is also ambiguity regarding the interpretation of acceleration within the defined system.

Woopa
Messages
20
Reaction score
4
I am having difficulty understanding the information below. In the second line it states that F=0 as there is no external force on the system. However it later calculates acceleration of the rocket.

How can Force=0 if there is acceleration? (This is the first time I have encountered the product rule so this may be part of my misunderstanding)

1678945247034.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The keyword here is "system". By considering both the propellant (initial at rest inside the rocket) and the rocket itself to be part of the system and then say this system is isolated we are effectively saying that the net force between the mass inside and any mass outside the system is zero, leaving us to consider only forces between mass inside the system. This then means the momentum of the system is unchanged, or equivalently, if one part of the system, e.g. some of the propellant, accelerate one way then another part, e.g. the rocket plus its remaining propellant, has to accelerate in the opposite direction.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: topsquark, Ibix, PeroK and 1 other person
Woopa said:
Note that the "new form" of Newton's second law given here is not valid in general. There are several threads on here analysing this question.

In fact it's not really Newton's second law, but an equation that is only valid in this specific case.

PS the author has confusingly used the same letter ##v## for the velocity of the rocket and the velocity of the expellant. A simpler way to look at this is to use conservation of momentum:
$$m_r\Delta v_r + \Delta m_e v_e = 0$$Where we need the assumption that ##\Delta m_e## is small compared to ##m_r##. Otherwise, we would need to be more explicit that the mass of the rocket is changing from ##m_r + m_e## to ##m_r## after the expellent is fired out.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Filip Larsen, vanhees71 and topsquark
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: erobz, vanhees71, PeroK and 1 other person
PS if we are being harsh, then the author has made two mistakes which cancel out and contrive to get the right equation:

1) Wrongly stating Newton's second law as ##F = m\frac{\Delta v}{\Delta t} + v\frac{\Delta m}{\Delta t}##.

2) Mistakingly using the change in velocity of the rocket as ##\Delta v## and the velocity of the expellant as ##v## in this equation.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: erobz, Ibix and vanhees71
Woopa said:
How can Force=0 if there is acceleration?
There is no acceleration. The rocket accelerates in one direction and the propellant accelerates in the opposite direction. The acceleration of the system (the system consisting of the rocket and the propellant) is zero.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
4K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K