Newton's second law -- rockets

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion clarifies the application of Newton's second law in the context of rocket propulsion, specifically addressing the apparent contradiction between zero net external force and the acceleration of the rocket. It emphasizes that when considering the rocket and its propellant as a closed system, the internal forces balance out, leading to a net force of zero. The momentum conservation principle is highlighted as a more accurate framework for understanding the dynamics of the system, particularly when the mass of the rocket changes due to propellant expulsion. The author also points out errors in the original formulation of Newton's second law as applied to this scenario.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's laws of motion
  • Familiarity with the concept of momentum conservation
  • Basic knowledge of rocket propulsion mechanics
  • Ability to interpret mathematical equations in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and implications of the rocket equation
  • Learn about the conservation of momentum in isolated systems
  • Explore advanced applications of Newton's laws in non-inertial reference frames
  • Investigate the role of mass flow rate in rocket propulsion dynamics
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, aerospace engineers, and anyone interested in the principles of rocket dynamics and propulsion systems.

Woopa
Messages
20
Reaction score
4
I am having difficulty understanding the information below. In the second line it states that F=0 as there is no external force on the system. However it later calculates acceleration of the rocket.

How can Force=0 if there is acceleration? (This is the first time I have encountered the product rule so this may be part of my misunderstanding)

1678945247034.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The keyword here is "system". By considering both the propellant (initial at rest inside the rocket) and the rocket itself to be part of the system and then say this system is isolated we are effectively saying that the net force between the mass inside and any mass outside the system is zero, leaving us to consider only forces between mass inside the system. This then means the momentum of the system is unchanged, or equivalently, if one part of the system, e.g. some of the propellant, accelerate one way then another part, e.g. the rocket plus its remaining propellant, has to accelerate in the opposite direction.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: topsquark, Ibix, PeroK and 1 other person
Woopa said:
Note that the "new form" of Newton's second law given here is not valid in general. There are several threads on here analysing this question.

In fact it's not really Newton's second law, but an equation that is only valid in this specific case.

PS the author has confusingly used the same letter ##v## for the velocity of the rocket and the velocity of the expellant. A simpler way to look at this is to use conservation of momentum:
$$m_r\Delta v_r + \Delta m_e v_e = 0$$Where we need the assumption that ##\Delta m_e## is small compared to ##m_r##. Otherwise, we would need to be more explicit that the mass of the rocket is changing from ##m_r + m_e## to ##m_r## after the expellent is fired out.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Filip Larsen, vanhees71 and topsquark
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: erobz, vanhees71, PeroK and 1 other person
PS if we are being harsh, then the author has made two mistakes which cancel out and contrive to get the right equation:

1) Wrongly stating Newton's second law as ##F = m\frac{\Delta v}{\Delta t} + v\frac{\Delta m}{\Delta t}##.

2) Mistakingly using the change in velocity of the rocket as ##\Delta v## and the velocity of the expellant as ##v## in this equation.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: erobz, Ibix and vanhees71
Woopa said:
How can Force=0 if there is acceleration?
There is no acceleration. The rocket accelerates in one direction and the propellant accelerates in the opposite direction. The acceleration of the system (the system consisting of the rocket and the propellant) is zero.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 117 ·
4
Replies
117
Views
9K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
5K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K