Newton's Second Law vs. Energy Equations

Click For Summary
In solving problems related to kinetics and energy, Newton's second law (F=ma) is essential when calculating acceleration or normal forces, while energy equations are more effective for scenarios involving velocities and displacements. Energy methods work well with position-varying forces, particularly in two-body systems and gravitational problems, but they lack an explicit time factor and face limitations with non-conservative forces. Non-conservative forces include friction, air drag, and normal forces, which complicate energy conservation. Despite these limitations, energy equations can still be applied meaningfully in the presence of non-conservative forces. Understanding when to use each method is crucial for effectively tackling various physics problems.
JJBladester
Gold Member
Messages
281
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement



I'm taking a test next week on kinetics and energy of moving particles. Problems include things like sliding blocks, friction, braking automobiles, collars sliding on poles, springs, max/min heights/velocities, tensions, accelerations, etc...

We learned two ways of solving problems in the kinetics realm... Newton's second law and energy equations. When do I use one vs. the other?

Homework Equations



Newton's 2nd Law
F=ma

PE=Potential Energy, KE=Kinetic Energy, SE=Spring Energy, Work could be from friction, drag, etc.

Energy Eqn
PE1+KE1+SE1+Work=PE2+KE2+SE2


The Attempt at a Solution



My gut says that if the problem is asking for an acceleration or a normal force, F=ma needs to get involved. Otherwise, I may or may not need to use F=ma + the energy eqn.

We're using chapter 12/13 in Vector Mechanics for Engineers by Beer/Johnston 8th Ed.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Energy equations are extremely helpful when dealing with problems involving velocities and displacements. They however do not have an explicit time factor.
Energy methods are more useful when dealing with position varying forces,as in a two body system. I remember I tried to solve a two body problem using the force method here on pf and ended up scratching my head for a real long time. Gravitation problems are also easier to do using energy methods.
However energy conservation has its limitations-Newton's Laws do not have that problem.Being the more basic they are applicable even when energy conservation is flouted.
I think you would like to check the thread "Force method for two body systems" to see my point.
 
Thanks aim1732... I couldn't find the thread you referenced. Perhaps you could post the link here?

The "do not have an explicit time factor" part makes sense. My tutor said something about not being able to use the energy equations with "non-conservative" forces, like the normal force. What, besides the normal force, air/water drag, and frictional forces are non-conservative in everyday life?
 
Here's the link:
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=386683"
You would encounter non-conservative forces that you mentioned plus some lesser known ones as the battery force that is responsible for maintaining potential difference across the terminals of a battery,and non elastic material stress. However it is worth noting that energy equations(as opposed to conservation of mechanical energy) are still valid and can be applied meaningfully for even non-conservative forces.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thread 'Correct statement about size of wire to produce larger extension'
The answer is (B) but I don't really understand why. Based on formula of Young Modulus: $$x=\frac{FL}{AE}$$ The second wire made of the same material so it means they have same Young Modulus. Larger extension means larger value of ##x## so to get larger value of ##x## we can increase ##F## and ##L## and decrease ##A## I am not sure whether there is change in ##F## for first and second wire so I will just assume ##F## does not change. It leaves (B) and (C) as possible options so why is (C)...

Similar threads

Replies
28
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
44
Views
3K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
17
Views
3K