Newton's third law in non-inertial frames

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Newton's third law is valid in non-inertial frames when considering the forces between two objects in contact, as these forces remain equal and opposite regardless of the reference frame. However, the second law does not hold in accelerating frames without the introduction of fictitious forces to account for the frame's acceleration. This distinction is crucial for determining whether a frame is inertial. If the interaction forces do not align with Newton's second law, the frame is confirmed as non-inertial.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's laws of motion
  • Familiarity with inertial and non-inertial reference frames
  • Knowledge of fictitious forces and their role in physics
  • Basic grasp of vector forces and their interactions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of fictitious forces in non-inertial frames
  • Explore the mathematical formulation of Newton's second law in non-inertial frames
  • Investigate examples of rotating reference frames and their effects on motion
  • Learn about the application of Newton's laws in advanced physics contexts, such as general relativity
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, educators, and professionals interested in classical mechanics, particularly those exploring the nuances of Newton's laws in various reference frames.

Debdutta
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Is Newton's third law valid in non-inertial frames? For example, in a rotating frame of reference, can Newton's third law still be applied? Or does the non-inertial character of the frame violate it?
 
Science news on Phys.org
Debdutta said:
Is Newton's third law valid in non-inertial frames?

Only if the second law is not valid. But usually the second law is assumed to be valid in non-inertial frames. This results in pseudo forces violating the third law.
 
Welcome to PF!

Hi Debdutta! Welcome to PF! :smile:
Debdutta said:
Is Newton's third law valid in non-inertial frames?

As between two objects in contact?

Yes, the forces will still be equal and opposite.
 
  • Like
Likes gracy
The forces acting between two objects do not depend on the coordinate system or referemce frame you use to measure them. So the third law always holds.

The second law is different: the apparent accelerations that you measure DO depend on the reference frame, hence the second law does not hold in a accelerating frame unless you add another term to the equation (a.k.a a fictitious force) to compensate for the acceleration of the frame.
 
  • Like
Likes rohit dutta and gracy
So my next question is, can we assume that Newton's Third Law is still valid for interacting objects in any frame to test whether it is actually an inertial frame or not, that is, the first two laws of Newton hold or not?
 
Debdutta said:
So my next question is, can we assume that Newton's Third Law is still valid for interacting objects in any frame to test whether it is actually an inertial frame or not, that is, the first two laws of Newton hold or not?
Yes. You can always assume that the interaction forces between objects obey Newton's Third Law. If the sum of all interaction forces on an object and its coordinate acceleration are not consistent with Newtons Second Law, then you know that your frame is not inertial.
 
  • Like
Likes rohit dutta and gracy

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
4K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
7K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
8K