Newtons work and double derivative.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on Newton's work in kinematics, particularly the derivatives of distance, velocity, and acceleration. Participants explore why Newton did not define a fourth quantity, the derivative of acceleration, known as "jerk." It is noted that while jerk is significant in analyzing non-constant acceleration, Newton's mechanics primarily dealt with constant forces like gravity, making higher derivatives unnecessary for his equations. The conversation highlights that while acceleration due to gravity is often treated as constant, it can vary with distance, which is more relevant in larger-scale scenarios. Ultimately, the discussion emphasizes the simplicity and effectiveness of Newton's approach, adhering to the principle of not introducing unnecessary complexities.
vkash
Messages
316
Reaction score
1
I have read kinematics and laws of motion(1st,second and third). In these two chapters one thing i found that
firstly distance is taken as first assumption.then it's derivative as velocity OK.
then it's(velocity) derivative is taken as acceleration OK.
Then it's derivative(acceleration) is not taken!. but why he(our hero Newton) stops at acceleration why not create another quantity named say X which is derivative of acceleration. Is he leave it for vikash(me) to do hahaha LOL!(joke)
all derivative are with respect to time.
I have an answer for my own question.
(1) all motions can be defined on the basis of these three quantities.(mention am i correct here)

we all have felt force either due to gravity or due to lifts. when lift moves upward with due to changing velocity we feel extra force. How it feels of having changing acceleration? I mean if a lift is moving upwards with acceleration 2t (t is time). time varying acceleration. then how will it feel.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The 3rd derivative of distance is called 'jerk' and it is often used in analysis of non-constant acceleration, such as in harmonic systems. If you think about the effect of a change in acceleration, as when standing in a bus and starts up, you are jerked, hence the name.

When considering acceleration due to gravity, the acceleration is constant and therefore the 3rd derivative, jerk, is zero. All of the mechanics work by Newton, that I'm aware of, was dealing with gravity as the acceleration force, or another constant value force, thus no need for the 3rd derivative.
 
The fact that your book does not take a derivative of acceleration with respect to time just means that your book is over-simplified. The third derivative of position with respect to time (or the derivative of acceleration with respect to time) is known as the "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jerk_%28physics%29" " and is very important. If you think about it, F = ma tells us that whenever a force changes in time, then the acceleration changes in time and there is a jerk. Examples of the force changing in time would be: pressing the gas pedal of a car from half-way down to all the way down, having a cord break while Bungee jumping, accelerating down a hill on a bicycle and hitting a rock, etc. It is called a jerk because it feels like a jerk.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
DickL said:
The 3rd derivative of distance is called 'jerk' and it is often used in analysis of non-constant acceleration, such as in harmonic systems. If you think about the effect of a change in acceleration, as when standing in a bus and starts up, you are jerked, hence the name.

When considering acceleration due to gravity, the acceleration is constant and therefore the 3rd derivative, jerk, is zero. All of the mechanics work by Newton, that I'm aware of, was dealing with gravity as the acceleration force, or another constant value force, thus no need for the 3rd derivative.

The acceleration due to gravity is only constant as a local approximation. The gravitational force (and thus the acceleration) depends on the separation of the two objects. Objects farther away from the Earth experience less of its gravity and have a lower acceleration. But this spatial variation in gravitational force is so small for human-sized objects that the jerk can be ignored. For larger, farther objects such as comets, the change in acceleration becomes important.
 
Newton's equations fully describe the behaviour of (classical) cellestial mechanical system using position, velocity and acceleration with no need to use higher derivatives.

"why he(our hero Newton) stops at acceleration why not create another quantity"
Bacause he (contrary to many people) obeyed Occam's principle: don't create non-necessary entities.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?

Similar threads

Back
Top