No work done and no energy spent?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Mesmerized
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Work Work done
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the concept of work in physics, specifically addressing whether applying an opposing force (-F) to a stationary object results in work being done. It concludes that no work is performed when there is no displacement, regardless of the force applied. If the object is rigid, no energy is transferred; however, if the object can deform, energy may be stored in the form of potential energy. The conversation also highlights the inefficiency of using muscle power to apply force when mechanical means, such as clamps, could achieve the same result without energy expenditure.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's laws of motion
  • Basic knowledge of work-energy principles
  • Familiarity with concepts of force and displacement
  • Awareness of material deformation in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the work-energy theorem in detail
  • Explore the principles of elastic and plastic deformation in materials
  • Learn about energy conservation in mechanical systems
  • Investigate applications of force in structural engineering
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, engineers in structural design, and anyone interested in the principles of force and energy transfer in mechanical systems.

Mesmerized
Messages
54
Reaction score
0
Imagine there's some body and a force F trying to move that body. In that case the force will do a work and the body will start to accelerate (obtain a kinetic energy). Now also imagine that I'm applying a force -F right in the opposite direction of the existing force, when the body is still standing. Then it will remain standing as long as the 2 opposite forces are applied and cancel each other.

Question: Do I do some work or spent some energy while applying that force -F? If yes, then is there a formula for it, if no, then does that mean, that it's the same whether I do nothing or try to hold the body from moving by applying an equal force to the existing one but in opposite direction?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No, if there is no displacement, there is no work done by either force (assuming the body is rigid). No energy is transferred. All you're doing is not allowing the energy to be transferred from the first object applying that force.

If the object is not rigid, and can deform (like all objects on this earth) you would be transferring some of the energy into deforming the object and would be doing work.
 
Mesmerized said:
Imagine there's some body and a force F trying to move that body. In that case the force will do a work and the body will start to accelerate (obtain a kinetic energy). Now also imagine that I'm applying a force -F right in the opposite direction of the existing force, when the body is still standing. Then it will remain standing as long as the 2 opposite forces are applied and cancel each other.

Question: Do I do some work or spent some energy while applying that force -F? If yes, then is there a formula for it, if no, then does that mean, that it's the same whether I do nothing or try to hold the body from moving by applying an equal force to the existing one but in opposite direction?

There is no work done if there is no motion. So yes, your scenario is the same as doing nothing. You are performing no work on the body...unless, of course, the forces you are using are so great that you end up crushing the thing. Then you did do some work on it.

Also, you're not doing any work on the body, but if you're the one applying the force, then obviosuly you will get tired and have expended some work, on some level deep within your muscles. Unfortunately you got tired for nothing and all your work will have been wasted. But, that's just a limitation of the human body...

A more efficient way to accomplish the same thing is to simply put a clamp around the body, and let it squeeze it. You can then go watch 25 consecutive episodes of the Simpsons while applying your opposite forces without getting anyone tired.
 
Mesmerized said:
Question: Do I do some work or spent some energy while applying that force -F? If yes, then is there a formula for it, if no, then does that mean, that it's the same whether I do nothing or try to hold the body from moving by applying an equal force to the existing one but in opposite direction?
There is no work done by you on the object. Instead of your muscles you could just as well use two walls to apply that opposite forces to the object: no energy transfer, no work done. However, if you use your muscles, you convert energy internally to produce the force. But this energy doesn't go into the object, but dissipates as heat. Therefore no work is done on the object.

Think of a helicopter hovering at constant height. The engine uses energy but does no work on the helicopter chassis. Yet it still creates a force upward on the helicopter chassis.
 
Lsos said:
TYou can then go watch 25 consecutive episodes of the Simpsons while applying your opposite forces without getting anyone tired.
And while watching and flicking through the adds, you are putting a downwards force on your settee and could even fall asleep doing all this downward forcing.
 
thanks to all for detailed replies, got it :)
 
As mentioned above, if the body is not rigid, there is some deformation of its shape, so it stores energy like a spring when deformed by external forces. These types of work are relevant in structural engineering, architecture, and strengths of materials.
 
thanks SystemTheory
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
5K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
3K
  • · Replies 77 ·
3
Replies
77
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K