What is a pseudo-force and how does it relate to non inertial reference frames?

AI Thread Summary
A pseudo-force arises when analyzing motion from a non-inertial reference frame, which is accelerating relative to an inertial frame. This means that the reference frame itself is accelerating, not the object being observed. For example, when in a bus that accelerates forward, passengers feel a force pulling them backward, which is actually an illusion created by the bus's acceleration. This sensation is the pseudo-force, illustrating how non-inertial frames can create misleading perceptions of motion. Understanding pseudo-forces is essential for accurately describing dynamics in non-inertial reference frames.
sankarshana016
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
So I was told that a pseudo-force acts on a body when its's motion is analysed with respect to a non inertial reference frame. I'm a bit confused. Does that mean the reference frame is accelerating with respect to the body, or with respect to the earth? And why does there have to be any sort of pseudo force?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
sankarshana016 said:
So I was told that a pseudo-force acts on a body when its's motion is analysed with respect to a non inertial reference frame. I'm a bit confused. Does that mean the reference frame is accelerating with respect to the body, or with respect to the earth?

Neither. It means that an object at rest in that coordinate system is accelerating relative to an object in free-fall.
 
may be an example might help. Imagine you're in a Bus and it starts accelerating. You will feel like you're being pulled to the back of the bus. In fact you're not being pulled at all and the bus instead is accelerating forward. The bus is the non inertial frame since it is accelerating and the illusion that you're being pulled to the back of the bus is the pseudo-force.
 
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top