Non-Regular Language, Pumping Lemma

  • Thread starter Thread starter Fatima Hasan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Language
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around proving that a specific language, denoted as L, is non-regular using the pumping lemma. Participants confirm that the initial solution presented is correct, emphasizing the importance of considering all cases rather than relying solely on a single counter-example. The pumping lemma's requirement to divide the string into segments that meet certain conditions is highlighted as crucial to the proof. There is a consensus that a thorough approach is necessary for a valid argument. The conversation ultimately reinforces the significance of the pumping lemma in demonstrating non-regularity.
Fatima Hasan
Messages
315
Reaction score
14

Homework Statement


Prove that ## L ## is non-regular language.
png.png


2. Homework Equations

none

The Attempt at a Solution


upload_2018-4-20_18-13-24.png


upload_2018-4-20_18-13-33.png


upload_2018-4-20_18-13-40.png


upload_2018-4-20_18-13-52.png


So L is non-regular !
Is my solution correct?
 

Attachments

  • upload_2018-4-20_18-13-24.png
    upload_2018-4-20_18-13-24.png
    12.8 KB · Views: 1,408
  • upload_2018-4-20_18-13-33.png
    upload_2018-4-20_18-13-33.png
    11.8 KB · Views: 1,675
  • upload_2018-4-20_18-13-40.png
    upload_2018-4-20_18-13-40.png
    12.2 KB · Views: 1,085
  • upload_2018-4-20_18-13-52.png
    upload_2018-4-20_18-13-52.png
    12.7 KB · Views: 1,157
  • png.png
    png.png
    1.6 KB · Views: 1,024
Physics news on Phys.org
Fatima Hasan said:

Homework Statement


Prove that ## L ## is non-regular language.
View attachment 224379

2. Homework Equations

none

The Attempt at a Solution


View attachment 224375

View attachment 224376

View attachment 224377

View attachment 224378

So L is non-regular !
Is my solution correct?
It does appear to be correct. You could simplify it a little by noting that you only need one counter-example to prove a statement false.
Edit: I take that back. I think you are correct to consider all of the cases, since the pumping lemma says a way to divide S into xyz that satisfies the rest of the conditions exists.
 
  • Like
Likes Fatima Hasan

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K