Non-rotating vector fields with non-zero Curl

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the concept of curl in vector fields, particularly how non-rotating fields can still exhibit non-zero curl. It highlights that while a vector field like F = z hat y does not rotate on its own, it can still cause a wheel in a fluid to rotate, indicating a non-zero curl. The example of water flow illustrates that molecules can move in straight lines while still creating rotational effects due to varying velocities. Participants express a desire to explore more examples of such vector fields that appear non-rotational but possess non-zero curl. The conversation emphasizes the distinction between local motion and overall rotational behavior in fluid dynamics.
ShayanJ
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
2,801
Reaction score
606
In some texts the author tries to interpret operations like Curl.
Some say the curl of a vector field shows the amount of rotation of the vector field
But some of them say,if you put a wheel in a fluid velocity field which is like the vector field at hand,if it can rotate the wheel,then it has non-zero curl.
For example the field \vec{F}=z \hat{y} does not rotate by itself but if it shows a fluid velocity field,it can rotate wheels inside it and it has non-zero curl
But I'm just uneasy with the idea
maybe seeing more vector fields like this,ones which do not seem to rotate but have non-zero curl,make me better But I can't find more of such fields
Do you know one?
Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The point is that the field itself is not "rotating" because all motion is in the x- direction. If this were a flow of water, every molecule would flow in a straight line. But the speed of the the water would vary and, if fact, all water molecules above the xy-plane would flow in the positive y direction, all molecules below would flow in the negative y diretction. That is, if we were to put a "water wheel" with axis along the x-axis, water flowing by above the xy-plane would push it in the positive y direction, water flowing by beneath would push it in the negatve z direction and so it would rotate clockwise- as seen looking at it form x< 0. That is an argument why curl f= \nabla f, which, here is
\left|\begin{array}{ccc}\vec{i} &amp; \vec{j} &amp; \vec{k} \\ \frac{\partial}{\partial x} &amp; \frac{\partial }{\partial y} &amp; \frac{\partial}{\partial z} \\ 0 &amp; z &amp; 0\end{array}\right|= -\vec{i}
is non zero even though every water molecule is moving in a straight line.

And, it works the other way. Imagine that you are holding a pan of water in front of you. Very slowly, so that you do not "slosh", move that pan around in a circle in front of you. Now, every water molecule in the pan is moving in a circle, relative to the ground but there is no "rotary motion". If you were to write out the equations for the motion of the water, in x, y, z terms, you would get curl 0.
 
maybe seeing more vector fields like this,ones which do not seem to rotate but have non-zero curl,make me better But I can't find more of such fields
Do you know one?

Think about what you are asking.

The curl of any vector (a,b,c) is another vector (r,s,t)

for zero curl this requires r=s=t=0 since for any non zero r,s or t the modulus of the curl vector is √(r2+s2+t2)

However the velocity field in a fluid boundary layer is not (usaually) rotating, but has non zero curl. It may contain rotating vortices though.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K