Nonstandard Concave Mirror Optics, beyond the parabola.

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the effectiveness of parabolic mirrors compared to nonstandard concave mirrors, particularly third-order mirrors. It concludes that while third-order mirrors can reflect light, they do not focus light to a single point due to the lack of a uniform focal point. The conversation highlights that rays parallel to the axis will not converge at the same focal point unless the mirror is locally parabolic, as variations in ray displacement lead to divergent paths after multiple reflections.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of concave mirror optics
  • Familiarity with the properties of parabolic curves
  • Knowledge of light ray behavior and reflection principles
  • Basic grasp of higher-order polynomial functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties of third-order mirrors and their optical characteristics
  • Explore the mathematical modeling of light reflection in non-parabolic mirrors
  • Study the principles of ray optics and focal points in concave mirrors
  • Investigate the applications of nonstandard mirror shapes in optical devices
USEFUL FOR

Optical engineers, physicists, and anyone interested in advanced mirror design and light manipulation techniques.

xlearsi31
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Why is the parabola the most bent, concave, effective mirror?
What are some properties of a third order mirror (absolute value of x^3)? There is no uniform focal point. Shouldn't shining a light beam along a normal to the x-axis reflect off of the function multiple times?
Then take this to the nth order. Or make it exponential.
Does the result of the light beam end up converging to a "focal point" after all of its consecutive reflections?
Just some things I am curious about.
Thanks!
 
Science news on Phys.org
If I understand the question, you want to know if some other shape could produce light focussed at a point, albeit with some of the rays taking multiple reflections.
No.
Suppose there were such a point, F. Consider a light ray arriving parallel to the axis and eventually going through F. Now consider a neighbouring axis-parallel ray, just displaced a fraction from the first one. If the mirror is not locally a parabola, this will, after the same number of reflections, just miss F. OK, maybe you get lucky and it passes through F after some more reflections. So now look at a ray halfway between, etc. It's pretty clear that you cannot continuously displace rays and have them all coming through the same point, no two using the same number of reflections.
 
Thanks.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
6K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
8K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K