Nonuniform Semicircle of Charge problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter littlebilly91
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Charge
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the y-component of the electric field at the origin due to a non-uniformly charged semicircle with a charge density defined as λ = +5.8θ (μC/m) and radius R = 28.0 cm. The participants derive the electric field using the equation dE = (dq)/(4πεr²)sin(θ) and integrate from 0 to π. A key correction involves recognizing that dq = λdL, where dL = Rdθ, leading to the correct expression for dq. The final electric field calculation results in E = (5.8 × 10-6)/(4πεr)(2), confirming the positive direction of the electric field.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electric field concepts and calculations
  • Familiarity with integration techniques in calculus
  • Knowledge of charge density and its implications in electrostatics
  • Proficiency in using the constant ε = 8.85 × 10-12 F/m
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of electric fields from continuous charge distributions
  • Learn about the application of integration in electrostatics problems
  • Explore the concept of non-uniform charge distributions in more complex geometries
  • Investigate the implications of charge density variations on electric field calculations
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics, particularly those studying electromagnetism, as well as educators and professionals involved in electrostatics and electric field analysis.

littlebilly91
Messages
21
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A non-uniformly charged semicircle of radius R=28.0 cm lies in the xy plane, centered at the origin, as shown. The charge density varies as the angle θ (in radians) according to λ = + 5.8 θ, where λ has units of μC/m.
(picture included)
What is the y - component of the electric field at the origin?

Homework Equations



dE=\frac{dq}{4\pi\epsilon r^{2}}sin\theta

where \epsilon = 8.85*10^{-12}

\theta r = s

\lambda=\frac{q}{s}
-------------------------------------------

The Attempt at a Solution



First I derived (5.8*10^{-6})\theta^{2} r=q

and took the derivative 2(5.8*10^{-6}) r \theta d\theta=dq

substituted into equation 1
dE=\frac{2(5.8*10^{-6})}{4\pi\epsilon r}\theta sin(\theta)d\theta

Integrated from 0 to pi.
E=\frac{(5.8*10^{-6})}{2\pi\epsilon r}\int\theta sin(\theta)d\theta

The whole integral simplifies down to pi,which cancels out and leaves
E=\frac{(5.8*10^{-6})}{2\epsilon r}

I am getting 1.17*10^{6} N/C for an answer, but it's not correct.
Thanks for the help in advance.
 

Attachments

  • semicircle.gif
    semicircle.gif
    4.6 KB · Views: 1,385
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
First I derived (5.8*10^{-6})\theta^{2} r=q

It's supposed to be (5.8*10^{-6}/2)\theta^{2} r=q. A less roundabout way of doing this is to note that dq=λ*dL and dL=Rd(theta), so dq=λRd(theta).
 
ideasrule said:
It's supposed to be (5.8*10^{-6}/2)\theta^{2} r=q. A less roundabout way of doing this is to note that dq=λ*dL and dL=Rd(theta), so dq=λRd(theta).

why is that? I'm not seeing where that 2 came from. Does the 2 come in before the derivative because it's only half a circle?
 
A better question would be how you got (5.8*10^{-6})\theta^{2} r=q in the first place. Didn't you use dq/dl=λ, dq=λ*dl=λ*R*dθ?
 
I used \theta r = L and \lambda=\frac{q}{L} to get \lambda=\frac{q}{\theta r}. I substituted 5.8\theta for lambda and rearranged to solve for q. I didn't know how else to take the nonuniform charge into account.

Again, thanks for the help.
 
Lambda does not equal q/L because the charge density varies across the circle. Try using the method I described: dq=λ*dL and dL=Rd(theta), so dq=λRd(theta).
 
Okay, I understand why I was wrong before. Is it correct to go from dq=λRd(theta) to dq =5.8(theta)Rd(theta)?
 
Yup, that's correct.
 
Integrated from 0 to pi.
E=<br /> \frac{(5.8*10^{-6})}{4\pi\epsilon r}\int sin(\theta)d\theta<br />

=>(skipping a few steps) =>
E=<br /> \frac{(5.8*10^{-6})}{4\pi\epsilon r}(2)
I believe that would be correct.
And it should also be positive because it points towards the negative charge, right?
 
  • #10
Yeah, it's positive.
 
  • #11
thanks so much for the help!
 
  • #12
littlebilly91 said:
Integrated from 0 to pi.
E=<br /> \frac{(5.8*10^{-6})}{4\pi\epsilon r}\int sin(\theta)d\theta<br />

=>(skipping a few steps) =>
E=<br /> \frac{(5.8*10^{-6})}{4\pi\epsilon r}(2)
I believe that would be correct.
And it should also be positive because it points towards the negative charge, right?

How did you get rid of the
<br /> (\theta) from \int (\theta)sin(\theta) to \int sin(\theta)<br /> [\tex]
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
863
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
610
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K