Nonuniform Semicircle of Charge problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter littlebilly91
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Charge
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a non-uniformly charged semicircle with a charge density that varies with angle θ. Participants are tasked with determining the y-component of the electric field at the origin due to this semicircle.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the derivation of charge elements and the integration process for calculating the electric field. There are questions about the correct formulation of charge density and the integration limits.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided clarifications on the derivation of dq and the integration steps. There is an ongoing exploration of the correct approach to account for the non-uniform charge distribution, with no explicit consensus reached yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating through the implications of the semicircular geometry and the variable charge density, questioning assumptions about the derivation of equations and the integration process.

littlebilly91
Messages
21
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A non-uniformly charged semicircle of radius R=28.0 cm lies in the xy plane, centered at the origin, as shown. The charge density varies as the angle θ (in radians) according to λ = + 5.8 θ, where λ has units of μC/m.
(picture included)
What is the y - component of the electric field at the origin?

Homework Equations



dE=\frac{dq}{4\pi\epsilon r^{2}}sin\theta

where \epsilon = 8.85*10^{-12}

\theta r = s

\lambda=\frac{q}{s}
-------------------------------------------

The Attempt at a Solution



First I derived (5.8*10^{-6})\theta^{2} r=q

and took the derivative 2(5.8*10^{-6}) r \theta d\theta=dq

substituted into equation 1
dE=\frac{2(5.8*10^{-6})}{4\pi\epsilon r}\theta sin(\theta)d\theta

Integrated from 0 to pi.
E=\frac{(5.8*10^{-6})}{2\pi\epsilon r}\int\theta sin(\theta)d\theta

The whole integral simplifies down to pi,which cancels out and leaves
E=\frac{(5.8*10^{-6})}{2\epsilon r}

I am getting 1.17*10^{6} N/C for an answer, but it's not correct.
Thanks for the help in advance.
 

Attachments

  • semicircle.gif
    semicircle.gif
    4.6 KB · Views: 1,397
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
First I derived (5.8*10^{-6})\theta^{2} r=q

It's supposed to be (5.8*10^{-6}/2)\theta^{2} r=q. A less roundabout way of doing this is to note that dq=λ*dL and dL=Rd(theta), so dq=λRd(theta).
 
ideasrule said:
It's supposed to be (5.8*10^{-6}/2)\theta^{2} r=q. A less roundabout way of doing this is to note that dq=λ*dL and dL=Rd(theta), so dq=λRd(theta).

why is that? I'm not seeing where that 2 came from. Does the 2 come in before the derivative because it's only half a circle?
 
A better question would be how you got (5.8*10^{-6})\theta^{2} r=q in the first place. Didn't you use dq/dl=λ, dq=λ*dl=λ*R*dθ?
 
I used \theta r = L and \lambda=\frac{q}{L} to get \lambda=\frac{q}{\theta r}. I substituted 5.8\theta for lambda and rearranged to solve for q. I didn't know how else to take the nonuniform charge into account.

Again, thanks for the help.
 
Lambda does not equal q/L because the charge density varies across the circle. Try using the method I described: dq=λ*dL and dL=Rd(theta), so dq=λRd(theta).
 
Okay, I understand why I was wrong before. Is it correct to go from dq=λRd(theta) to dq =5.8(theta)Rd(theta)?
 
Yup, that's correct.
 
Integrated from 0 to pi.
E=<br /> \frac{(5.8*10^{-6})}{4\pi\epsilon r}\int sin(\theta)d\theta<br />

=>(skipping a few steps) =>
E=<br /> \frac{(5.8*10^{-6})}{4\pi\epsilon r}(2)
I believe that would be correct.
And it should also be positive because it points towards the negative charge, right?
 
  • #10
Yeah, it's positive.
 
  • #11
thanks so much for the help!
 
  • #12
littlebilly91 said:
Integrated from 0 to pi.
E=<br /> \frac{(5.8*10^{-6})}{4\pi\epsilon r}\int sin(\theta)d\theta<br />

=>(skipping a few steps) =>
E=<br /> \frac{(5.8*10^{-6})}{4\pi\epsilon r}(2)
I believe that would be correct.
And it should also be positive because it points towards the negative charge, right?

How did you get rid of the
<br /> (\theta) from \int (\theta)sin(\theta) to \int sin(\theta)<br /> [\tex]
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
987
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K