Nonuniform Semicircle of Charge problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter littlebilly91
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Charge
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
11 replies · 15K views
littlebilly91
Messages
21
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A non-uniformly charged semicircle of radius R=28.0 cm lies in the xy plane, centered at the origin, as shown. The charge density varies as the angle θ (in radians) according to λ = + 5.8 θ, where λ has units of μC/m.
(picture included)
What is the y - component of the electric field at the origin?

Homework Equations



dE=[tex]\frac{dq}{4\pi\epsilon r^{2}}sin\theta[/tex]

where [tex]\epsilon[/tex] = 8.85*10^{-12}

[tex]\theta r = s[/tex]

[tex]\lambda=\frac{q}{s}[/tex]
-------------------------------------------

The Attempt at a Solution



First I derived [tex](5.8*10^{-6})\theta^{2} r=q[/tex]

and took the derivative [tex]2(5.8*10^{-6}) r \theta d\theta=dq[/tex]

substituted into equation 1
dE=[tex]\frac{2(5.8*10^{-6})}{4\pi\epsilon r}\theta sin(\theta)d\theta[/tex]

Integrated from 0 to pi.
E=[tex]\frac{(5.8*10^{-6})}{2\pi\epsilon r}\int\theta sin(\theta)d\theta[/tex]

The whole integral simplifies down to pi,which cancels out and leaves
E=[tex]\frac{(5.8*10^{-6})}{2\epsilon r}[/tex]

I am getting 1.17*10^{6} N/C for an answer, but it's not correct.
Thanks for the help in advance.
 

Attachments

  • semicircle.gif
    semicircle.gif
    4.6 KB · Views: 1,403
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
First I derived [tex](5.8*10^{-6})\theta^{2} r=q[/tex]

It's supposed to be [tex](5.8*10^{-6}/2)\theta^{2} r=q[/tex]. A less roundabout way of doing this is to note that dq=λ*dL and dL=Rd(theta), so dq=λRd(theta).
 
ideasrule said:
It's supposed to be [tex](5.8*10^{-6}/2)\theta^{2} r=q[/tex]. A less roundabout way of doing this is to note that dq=λ*dL and dL=Rd(theta), so dq=λRd(theta).

why is that? I'm not seeing where that 2 came from. Does the 2 come in before the derivative because it's only half a circle?
 
A better question would be how you got [tex](5.8*10^{-6})\theta^{2} r=q[/tex] in the first place. Didn't you use dq/dl=λ, dq=λ*dl=λ*R*dθ?
 
I used [tex]\theta r = L[/tex] and [tex]\lambda=\frac{q}{L}[/tex] to get [tex]\lambda=\frac{q}{\theta r}[/tex]. I substituted [tex]5.8\theta[/tex] for lambda and rearranged to solve for q. I didn't know how else to take the nonuniform charge into account.

Again, thanks for the help.
 
Lambda does not equal q/L because the charge density varies across the circle. Try using the method I described: dq=λ*dL and dL=Rd(theta), so dq=λRd(theta).
 
Okay, I understand why I was wrong before. Is it correct to go from dq=λRd(theta) to dq =5.8(theta)Rd(theta)?
 
Integrated from 0 to pi.
E=[tex] \frac{(5.8*10^{-6})}{4\pi\epsilon r}\int sin(\theta)d\theta[/tex]

=>(skipping a few steps) =>
E=[tex] \frac{(5.8*10^{-6})}{4\pi\epsilon r}(2)[/tex]
I believe that would be correct.
And it should also be positive because it points towards the negative charge, right?
 
thanks so much for the help!
 
littlebilly91 said:
Integrated from 0 to pi.
E=[tex] \frac{(5.8*10^{-6})}{4\pi\epsilon r}\int sin(\theta)d\theta[/tex]

=>(skipping a few steps) =>
E=[tex] \frac{(5.8*10^{-6})}{4\pi\epsilon r}(2)[/tex]
I believe that would be correct.
And it should also be positive because it points towards the negative charge, right?

How did you get rid of the
[tex] (\theta) from \int (\theta)sin(\theta) to \int sin(\theta)<br /> [\tex][/tex]