Normal Force of a Sliding Rope: Debunking the Myth

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The normal force acting on a rope sliding off a table is not simply the weight of the rope resting on the table. As the rope hangs over the edge, it exerts a downward force that contributes to the overall normal force. This force must counteract both the weight of the rope on the table and the additional force from the hanging segment. The discussion emphasizes that the normal force adjusts dynamically based on the forces acting on the entire system, including the rope's weight and frictional forces.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's laws of motion
  • Familiarity with concepts of normal force and friction
  • Basic knowledge of static and dynamic equilibrium
  • Concept of forces acting on a system involving pulleys
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of dynamic friction and its impact on moving objects
  • Explore the mechanics of pulleys and their effect on force distribution
  • Learn about the mathematical modeling of forces in systems with multiple components
  • Investigate the role of tension in ropes and its interaction with normal forces
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, mechanical engineers, and anyone interested in understanding the dynamics of forces in systems involving ropes and pulleys.

PatPwnt
Messages
83
Reaction score
0
If I have an extended (uncoiled) rope sitting on a table, and part of it is hanging off the edge of the table so that it starts to slide (there is friction), how would the normal force of the table acting on the rope change as it slides off? This has been bugging me for weeks, because people keep telling me that the normal force is just the weight of the rope on top of the table. I have a hard time believing this because the rope hanging over the edge may still pull the table top rope, contributing to the normal force.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Assuming an idealized case where dynamic coefficient of friction is constant regardless of speed, the friction force = (weight of rope on table) x (dynamic coefficient of friction). The downwards force beyond the edge of the table = weight of segment of rope between edge of table and ground.
 
The downwards force beyond the edge of the table still tugs on the part of the rope on the table though. So the normal force must also cancel this out and may be different than just the weight of the rope on the table.
 
There's no rule that states the forces cancel. Assuming the downwards force is greater than the friction force, then the rope accelerates.
 
I mean that the part of the rope on top of the table stays on the table until it moves over the edge. If the rope isn't moving upward off the table or downward through the table, then the forces must be canceling. That's the rule. So why would the normal force only be the weight of the rope on top of the table when the rope hanging over is still pulling down on it?
 
PatPwnt said:
I mean that the part of the rope on top of the table stays on the table until it moves over the edge. If the rope isn't moving upward off the table or downward through the table, then the forces must be canceling. That's the rule. So why would the normal force only be the weight of the rope on top of the table when the rope hanging over is still pulling down on it?
Think of the edge of the table as a frictionless, intertialess pulley, the downforce from the rope on the outer part of the pulley is converted into a sideforce on the inner part of the pulley.
 
But, that is not what is happening. If we consider there to be a pulley. It must be considered part of the system. Then the rope pulling down on the side also pulls down on the pulley and it also has a normal force.
 
PatPwnt said:
But, that is not what is happening. If we consider there to be a pulley. It must be considered part of the system. Then the rope pulling down on the side also pulls down on the pulley and it also has a normal force.
The end of the table or whatever the pulley is mounted to reacts to any downwards component of force by deforming (compressing) a tiny amount and exerting an opposing upwards force.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
46
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K