I Normal Mode calculation steps

vgarg
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Can someone please explain me the steps of calculation of X1:X2 after putting in the lower value of W^2 in equation 9.9 in "Riley, Hobson, Bence - Mathematical Methods for Physics and Engineering 2006 - pg 319"? I have attached the page as a PDF file.
Thank you.
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
A and B are matrices you know, and ##\,omega## is a number that you know, so you can plug them all in and you get like like ##Cx=0## for some matrix ##C## that you know. You might at first guess that gives you two equations and two unknown (##x## is a vector of 2 dimensions, the 0 on the right side is also a vector of 2 dimensions so you get two equations) but if ##x## is a solution so is ##\alpha x## for any scalar ##\alpha##, which means the two equations are not independent, and there are infinite solutions. So all you can do is express one variable in terms of the other which is the same as computing their ratio
 
Office_Shredder said:
A and B are matrices you know, and ##\,omega## is a number that you know, so you can plug them all in and you get like like ##Cx=0## for some matrix ##C## that you know. You might at first guess that gives you two equations and two unknown (##x## is a vector of 2 dimensions, the 0 on the right side is also a vector of 2 dimensions so you get two equations) but if ##x## is a solution so is ##\alpha x## for any scalar ##\alpha##, which means the two equations are not independent, and there are infinite solutions. So all you can do is express one variable in terms of the other which is the same as computing their ratio
Thank you very much.
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 50 ·
2
Replies
50
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
688
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K