Normal reaction, is this a concept we really understand?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of normal reaction forces in physics, particularly in the context of a block resting on a smooth surface. Participants explore the relationship between weight and normal force, addressing common misconceptions and clarifying the roles of these forces in free body diagrams.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the common belief that weight and normal reaction forces cancel each other, suggesting that it is actually the gravitational attraction between the block and the Earth that should be considered.
  • Another participant asserts that the weight of the block and the normal force do cancel when analyzing the net force on the block, which results in zero net force and thus static equilibrium.
  • A different viewpoint emphasizes the importance of recognizing the objects on which the forces act, clarifying that the weight acts on the block while the gravitational force it exerts on the Earth acts on the Earth itself.
  • One participant explains that while the weight and the force the block exerts on the Earth are equal and opposite, they do not cancel each other out in the context of the block's motion.
  • There is a mention of the normal force being present only when the block is in contact with the surface, which opposes the weight of the block when it is at rest.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the relationship between weight and normal force, with some agreeing that they cancel in terms of net force on the block, while others emphasize that the forces act on different objects and do not cancel in that context. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the interpretation of these forces.

Contextual Notes

Some participants highlight the need to clarify definitions and the context of forces acting on different objects, which may lead to confusion in understanding the normal reaction force.

kirakun
Messages
24
Reaction score
1
Hi guys ^^ I am still at A level physics, so don't flame me for my lack of knowledge
Now i have been taught that for ex:

We have a block of wood named A at rest on a perfectly smooth surface.

If we analyse a free body diagram, we have a weight mg downwards acting on the block and a normal reaction force acting at the boundary of the block and surface. Also we have the same normal reaction, by the block on the ground at the boundary too.
So why do we have the misconception (maybe its me only XD) that the weight and the normal reaction cancel out.
Is'nt it really the weight and the force the block attracts the earth(laws of gravitation) which cancel each other.
I don't know if its "my" misconception, but I've seen many books very unclear about this.

Feel free to comment. Thank you :)

Edit: o.o if we assume what i said is true, then how do we assign a magnitude to normal reaction force? D: I am getting confused

Edit 2 : thanks a lot everyone, that cleared many doubts for me :)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
kirakun said:
Hi guys ^^ I am still at A level physics, so don't flame me for my lack of knowledge
Now i have been taught that for ex:

We have a block of wood named A at rest on a perfectly smooth surface.

If we analyse a free body diagram, we have a weight mg downwards acting on the block and a normal reaction force acting at the boundary of the block and surface. Also we have the same normal reaction, by the block on the ground at the boundary too.
So why do we have the misconception (maybe its me only XD) that the weight and the normal reaction cancel out.
That is not a misconception. The blocks weight and the normal force on the block cancel out when computing the net force on the block, which zero so the block remains static.

kirakun said:
Is'nt it really the weight and the force the block attracts the earth(laws of gravitation) which cancel each other.
The foces of gravity acting on block and Earth act on two different objects. So they don't cancel out when computing the net force on any object. They do cancel out when computing the net momentum-transfer for the entire system, which must be zero for a closed system.
kirakun said:
Edit: o.o if we assume what i said is true, then how do we assign a magnitude to normal reaction force?
Fnet = 0 so Fnormal = -Fweigth
 
You should always remember what object the forces you are looking at are acting on. The weight force and the normal force both act on the block of wood itself. The gravitational force that the wood attracts the Earth with acts on the Earth and not the wood block.
 
kirakun said:
Is'nt it really the weight and the force the block attracts the earth(laws of gravitation) which cancel each other?

No. Those forces are indeed equal and acting in opposite directions, but they're acting on different things. One (the weight of the block) is acting on the block so wants to accelerate the block and the other is acting on the Earth so wants to accelerate the earth.

Suppose the block were not resting on the ground; we pick up and then let go of it so it falls. While it's falling, both of these forces are still at work and the block is accelerating (so is the earth, but the same force acting on much more massive Earth produces no measurable acceleration), so it's pretty clear that these two forces don't cancel.

When the block is resting on the surface of the earth, it's no longer accelerating, so something has to be opposing the force of its weight; that something is the normal force, which isn't present until the block and the Earth are touching.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 52 ·
2
Replies
52
Views
4K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K