Normality of Vinegar and Acidity of Acetic Acid

  • Thread starter Thread starter Blockmeister
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Acid
AI Thread Summary
Normality refers to the concentration of a solution in terms of equivalent per liter, while acidity measures the concentration of hydrogen ions in a solution. Understanding these concepts is crucial for interpreting titration results involving acetic acid, which is the main component of vinegar. To solve related problems, reviewing class notes and researching definitions online is recommended. Engaging with these foundational concepts will clarify the relationship between vinegar's normality and the acidity of acetic acid. Mastering these terms is essential for successfully completing the homework assignments.
Blockmeister
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


cabc866b56.png

18d053f769.png



I have no idea how to do any of these
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Totally lost huh? Looks like the results of titration experiments. You should have done many of these by now.

To do these problems you need to know what normality and acidity are, and how they are measured.
So you need to go through your own notes, and maybe look for the definitions online, for information surrounding those terms. Have you done this? What did you come up with?
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

Similar threads

Back
Top