Normalizers an p-Sylow subgroups

  • Thread starter Thread starter barbutzo
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving that for a finite group G with a normal subgroup H, and a p-Sylow subgroup B of H, it holds that G = HN_G(B), where N_G(B) is the normalizer of B in G. Key points include the use of the Sylow theorems and Frattini's argument. The proof involves showing that for any element g in G, the conjugate gBg^-1 remains a p-Sylow subgroup of H, thus establishing the relationship between G, H, and N_G(B).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of finite group theory
  • Familiarity with Sylow theorems
  • Knowledge of normal subgroups and normalizers
  • Concept of group actions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Sylow theorems in detail
  • Explore Frattini's argument and its applications
  • Learn about normalizers in group theory
  • Investigate group actions and their implications in finite groups
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, particularly those specializing in group theory, students tackling advanced algebra topics, and anyone interested in the structural properties of finite groups.

barbutzo
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Let G be a finite group, and H be a normal subgroup of G. Let B be a p-Sylow subgroup of H, for some p dividing |H|. Show that G=HN_G(B).

(N_G(B) is the normalizer of B in G, that is the biggest subgroup of G which contains B and B is normal in it. Equivalently N_G(B)={g\inG|gBg^-1=B})

Homework Equations



The Sylow theorems.

The Attempt at a Solution



To tell the truth I'm pretty stumped with this question. I know that the index of the normalizer is the number of p-Sylow subgroups, but B is a p-Sylow subgroup of H, and the normalizer is in G. I also know that B must be the only p-Sylow subgroup of its normalizer. I can't see how this adds up to a solution. I also tried considering a left action of H on G, but things seem to abstract to get something from that.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is a classical result, called Frattini's argument.

The proof is pretty straightforward. So if you don't want to look it up, here's a hint: take a g in G and consider g-1Bg. There are two important things we can say about this - what are they?
 
well, first, since H is normal, gBg^-1 is a subgroup of H.
second, it's also a p-Sylow subgroup of H, so it's conjugate to B.

Oh! so it's also of the form hBh^-1!
great, I'll take it from here. thanks!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K