How Do I Determine Net Velocity from Velocity Components and Current?

  • Thread starter Thread starter LeighV
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Net Velocity
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on determining net velocity from velocity components and current, specifically for an object moving at 5 m/s at an angle of 55 degrees north of west against a current of 3.0 m/s south. Participants emphasize the importance of vector addition, suggesting that the resultant velocity can be found by splitting the velocities into their X and Y components and summing them. The correct approach involves using trigonometric functions to calculate the components of the object's velocity and the current, followed by algebraic addition while considering the direction of each vector.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector components and trigonometry
  • Familiarity with the concept of relative and absolute motion
  • Knowledge of how to perform vector addition graphically and analytically
  • Ability to interpret angles in navigation (e.g., "north of west")
NEXT STEPS
  • Learn how to calculate vector components using trigonometric functions
  • Study the principles of relative motion in physics
  • Explore graphical methods for vector addition, such as the tip-to-tail method
  • Investigate real-world applications of vector addition in navigation and physics problems
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, engineering, and navigation who need to understand vector addition and motion in a medium, particularly those dealing with problems involving currents and angles.

LeighV
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Hi, really I just want to know if I have drawn this out correctly. I have an object with a velocity going North of West.
It is going against a current South. As you can see from the chart I have mapped out the degree the object is heading North of West. How would I find net velocity from this information?
This is what I have drawn so far - would I be solving for the purple line or is this incorrect?
f3uyd3.png

If so, I would need to find the components?
Vy = Vsin 0
and
Vx = Vcos 0

Vy for current is on the negative y axis. So this would end up being -3.0...?
We don't know the distance, but we need to find net velocity, so we can't use displacement.

This is where I get stumped.
Thank you for setting me on the right path!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Does the problem say specifically 55 degrees "north of west"? I don't see that in your statement of the problem but, if so, then your picture is correct. "North of west" without a specific angle measure would be peculiar. "Northwest", alone, specifically means "45 degrees north of west" (which is also "45 degrees west of north", of course).

Also, if you are told the object is going "55 degrees north of west at 5 m/s" then your "5 m/s" should be on the black arrow, not the blue one. Please give the full statement of the problem.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: LeighV
Hi LeighV, Welcome to Physics Forums.

When you want to find the resultant of two vectors that are being added you place the vectors tip to tail or complete the parallelogram, or algebraically sum their X-Y components:
Fig1.gif
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: LeighV
HallsofIvy said:
Does the problem say specifically 55 degrees "north of west"? I don't see that in your statement of the problem but, if so, then your picture is correct. "North of west" without a specific angle measure would be peculiar. "Northwest", alone, specifically means "45 degrees north of west" (which is also "45 degrees west of north", of course).

Also, if you are told the object is going "55 degrees north of west at 5 m/s" then your "5 m/s" should be on the black arrow, not the blue one. Please give the full statement of the problem.
Hi, sorry if I wasn't clear enough. Yes it says 55 degrees north of west. Thank you. The blue/purple arrow was just one I added into try and figure out if that was what I needed to answer (find the value for), the black arrow represents the direction not necessarily the speed. Thank you for your response!
 
gneill said:
Hi LeighV, Welcome to Physics Forums.

When you want to find the resultant of two vectors that are being added you place the vectors tip to tail or complete the parallelogram, or algebraically sum their X-Y components:
View attachment 74400
Thank you! So what does the purple arrow in your diagram stand for? Is that what I need to find or is that represented by those dashed lines?

Also, TARDIS. You are awesome.
 
Remember to sum the velocities separately by components. And please note that, in problems where there is something moving within a moving medium, it's useful to remember the rule:

absolute motion = relative motion + dragging motion

For example, you step in an escalator that moves with velocity w and start going up the steps at a velocity v. Your absolute motion (with respect to the building) is the sum of your relative motion (yours with respect to the escalator, that is, v) and the dragging velocity (that of the escalator wit respect to the building).

In your problem, you're trying to find the absolute velocity; you know the relative velocity (with respect to the medium, water, probably, but that doesn't matter) and you know also the... [here my help has to stop]
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: LeighV
That really helps me NTW, thank you. The relative motion is 5.0 "you know also the...dragging motion?" Being 3.0?

So when I find the components of the velocities, I just add them together?
 
LeighV said:
That really helps me NTW, thank you. The relative motion is 5.0 "you know also the...dragging motion?" Being 3.0?

So when I find the components of the velocities, I just add them together?

The dragging motion is the motion of the medium with respect to the absolute reference. In the case of the escalator example, the absolute reference is the building. In the case of a sea or lake, the reference is the coast... The dragging motion, in the case of a river, would be that of the river water with respect to the river bank...

Just split the vector of each velocity by components and then add them, minding the signs...
 
LeighV, the graphic addition of your vector was already explained above, by gneill.

Now, to do it 'analytically', you should start by stating the vectors: you have, for example, v (the velocity of the object in the current), w (the velocity of the current with respect to the shore, or to distant, non-moving waters...). And -as you want the sum of those two vectors- you should start by splitting into components. You are in the plane, with two dimensions, and your vectors are defined by its two components, horizontal and vertical.

Let's start with v. If the angle that it forms with the left x-axis angle is really 55º (is it, really?), then the horizontal component is

v(x) = v*cos 55º = 5*0,57 = 2,87 => -2,87

and the vertical one:

v(y) = v*cos 35º = v*sin 55º = 5*0,82 = 4,10

Now we go to vector w. This is easier, since it has no horizontal component. Only vertical, and 'down' (negative). Hence:

w(x) = 0

w(y) = -3

Now, the only thing you are left with is to find the two components of vector z, that is, z(x) and z(y)...

I shouldn't complete the problem... It's your job to do it... And please, confirm that the angle is 55º... As pointed out above in the thread, it could be 45º...
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: LeighV
  • #10
NTW said:
absolute motion = relative motion + dragging motion

For example, you step in an escalator that moves with velocity w and start going up the steps at a velocity v. Your absolute motion (with respect to the building) is the sum of your relative motion (yours with respect to the escalator, that is, v) and the dragging velocity (that of the escalator wit respect to the building).

I like to write out each velocity as "something with respect to (w.r.t.) something else", and then write out the sum in a way that visually "chains them together":

velocity of you w.r.t. building = velocity of you w.r.t escalator + velocity of escalator w.r.t. building

See how the position of the word "escalator" sort of chains the two velocities together on the right side?
 
  • #11
LeighV said:
Thank you! So what does the purple arrow in your diagram stand for? Is that what I need to find or is that represented by those dashed lines?
Yes, the purple arrow is the resultant of the the velocities being added (Black and Red vectors).
Also, TARDIS. You are awesome.
What can I say? I'm a fan :smile:
 
  • #12
Thank you all for your help! I think I get it now! :D
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
31
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
2K