Not understand online notes on the Green function

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
5 replies · 2K views
fluidistic
Gold Member
Messages
3,934
Reaction score
286

Homework Statement


I'm trying to self study Green function and I can't follow the very last step of a demonstration in an online notes (that I attach in this post). Page 7 to 8.
Basically he says that from [itex]G_{tt}(t,t')+\omega G(t,t')=0[/itex] for all [itex]t>t'[/itex] with the conditions [itex]G(t,t'+\varepsilon)=0[/itex] and [itex]G_{t} (t,t'+\varepsilon)=1[/itex] when [itex]\varepsilon[/itex] tends to 0. One can "easily" find out that [itex]G(t,t')=\frac{1}{\omega }\sin [\omega (t-t')][/itex].
My question is how do you find this out? I have no idea.

Homework Equations


No idea!


The Attempt at a Solution


100% clueless.
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
There's a typo in his notes. The differential equation should be ##y''(t) + \omega^2 y(t) = 0##. Considering what I've seen in your other threads, I find it hard to believe you don't know how to solve this ordinary differential equation with the given initial conditions.

Perhaps it's the notation that's throwing you off. Just think of t' as a parameter.
 
vela said:
There's a typo in his notes. The differential equation should be ##y''(t) + \omega^2 y(t) = 0##. Considering what I've seen in your other threads, I find it hard to believe you don't know how to solve this ordinary differential equation with the given initial conditions.

Perhaps it's the notation that's throwing you off. Just think of t' as a parameter.

Ok thanks, this makes the 3rd typo on this same page (I emailed him for the 2 others I saw and he replied with a thank you message).
I realize I misunderstood the initial conditions and consequently miswrote them here.

He uses the notation (for simplicity only) [itex]G(t,t')=y(t)[/itex]. So I am lead to think that when he writes [itex]y(t') = 0[/itex] he means [itex]G(t',t')=0[/itex]? Shouldn't it be [itex]G(0,t')=0[/itex]?
I'm totally confused.
 
Just consider t' to be fixed. Its value partitions the number line into two regions: t<t' and t>t'. What he did was solve the homogeneous equation to find a solution y1(t), valid for t<t', and a solution y2(t), valid for t>t'. There were initial conditions given for t<t', namely y(0)=0 and y'(0)=0, so he used those to pin down what y1(t) equaled for t<t'. Then by integrating the differential equation across the boundary, he derived what the initial conditions are for y2(t) — in other words, what y2(t') and y'2(t') equal.

Earlier, he wrote y2(t) = B sin ω(t-t1). Here, B and t1 are the arbitrary constants you get when you solve a second-order differential equation. You want to find B and t1 so that y2(t') = 0 and y'2(t') = 1.
 
Thank you very much vela. I now solved the problem using his notation and also keeping [itex]G(t,t')[/itex] instead of y(t).
I reach the result [itex]G(t,t')=0[/itex] for [itex]t<t'[/itex] and [itex]G(t,t')=\frac{\sin [\omega (t-t')] }{\omega }[/itex] for [itex]t>t'[/itex] as it should.