Not understand online notes on the Green function

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around understanding the Green function, particularly a demonstration found in online notes. The original poster expresses confusion regarding the derivation of the Green function from a specific equation involving G_{tt}(t,t') and boundary conditions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the interpretation of the differential equation and initial conditions, with some suggesting that notation may be a source of confusion. Others explore the implications of treating t' as a fixed parameter and how it affects the solution approach.

Discussion Status

Some participants have offered guidance on how to approach the problem, including clarifying the structure of the differential equation and the initial conditions. There is an acknowledgment of potential typos in the original notes, which may contribute to the confusion. The conversation reflects a mix of interpretations and attempts to clarify the problem without reaching a consensus.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the presence of typos in the online notes and question the accuracy of the initial conditions presented. There is also mention of the original poster's previous threads, suggesting a broader context of learning challenges.

fluidistic
Gold Member
Messages
3,934
Reaction score
286

Homework Statement


I'm trying to self study Green function and I can't follow the very last step of a demonstration in an online notes (that I attach in this post). Page 7 to 8.
Basically he says that from G_{tt}(t,t')+\omega G(t,t')=0 for all t>t' with the conditions G(t,t'+\varepsilon)=0 and G_{t} (t,t'+\varepsilon)=1 when \varepsilon tends to 0. One can "easily" find out that G(t,t')=\frac{1}{\omega }\sin [\omega (t-t')].
My question is how do you find this out? I have no idea.

Homework Equations


No idea!


The Attempt at a Solution


100% clueless.
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
There's a typo in his notes. The differential equation should be ##y''(t) + \omega^2 y(t) = 0##. Considering what I've seen in your other threads, I find it hard to believe you don't know how to solve this ordinary differential equation with the given initial conditions.

Perhaps it's the notation that's throwing you off. Just think of t' as a parameter.
 
vela said:
There's a typo in his notes. The differential equation should be ##y''(t) + \omega^2 y(t) = 0##. Considering what I've seen in your other threads, I find it hard to believe you don't know how to solve this ordinary differential equation with the given initial conditions.

Perhaps it's the notation that's throwing you off. Just think of t' as a parameter.

Ok thanks, this makes the 3rd typo on this same page (I emailed him for the 2 others I saw and he replied with a thank you message).
I realize I misunderstood the initial conditions and consequently miswrote them here.

He uses the notation (for simplicity only) G(t,t')=y(t). So I am lead to think that when he writes y(t') = 0 he means G(t',t')=0? Shouldn't it be G(0,t')=0?
I'm totally confused.
 
Just consider t' to be fixed. Its value partitions the number line into two regions: t<t' and t>t'. What he did was solve the homogeneous equation to find a solution y1(t), valid for t<t', and a solution y2(t), valid for t>t'. There were initial conditions given for t<t', namely y(0)=0 and y'(0)=0, so he used those to pin down what y1(t) equaled for t<t'. Then by integrating the differential equation across the boundary, he derived what the initial conditions are for y2(t) — in other words, what y2(t') and y'2(t') equal.

Earlier, he wrote y2(t) = B sin ω(t-t1). Here, B and t1 are the arbitrary constants you get when you solve a second-order differential equation. You want to find B and t1 so that y2(t') = 0 and y'2(t') = 1.
 
Thank you very much vela. I now solved the problem using his notation and also keeping G(t,t&#039;) instead of y(t).
I reach the result G(t,t&#039;)=0 for t&lt;t&#039; and G(t,t&#039;)=\frac{\sin [\omega (t-t&#039;)] }{\omega } for t&gt;t&#039; as it should.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
985
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K