Notation Question: What Does \bigcup^{N}_{1}x_{n} Mean?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Asphodel
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Notation
AI Thread Summary
The notation \bigcup^{N}_{1}x_{n} represents the union of a collection of sets indexed by n from 1 to N. This implies that it could be a finite union, such as x_{1} ∪ x_{2} ∪ ... ∪ x_{N}, but N can also be infinite or uncountable, complicating the interpretation. The discussion highlights the importance of understanding the context in which this notation is used, especially since it appears in established theorems and definitions. Misinterpretation could lead to significant errors in subsequent work. Clarification on this notation is essential for accurate mathematical communication.
Asphodel
Messages
443
Reaction score
0
I have something like this:

\bigcup^{N}_{1}x_{n}

What am I looking at? Is this x_{1}\cup x_{2}\cup x_{3}\cup ...\cup x_{N}?
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Yes, it's a union over some collection of sets.
 
Not necessarily because N can be infinite say...

x1 U x2 U x3 U ...

But also, N can be uncountable, which means listing them in whatever way is pointless and incorrect.
 
Thanks, Folland started using it without prior explanation (that I noticed).

It's the only interpretation that I could think of that made sense, but I didn't want to guess since it's already part of one theorem and one definition and if I guessed wrong then everything I did using those could be thrown off.
 
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top