Notation within homework question

  • Thread starter Thread starter mike_302
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Homework Notation
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
4 replies · 2K views
mike_302
Messages
102
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A particle moving along the x-axis is subject to a conservative force such that the potential energy of the particle is given by U(x,y)=2x + x^3 where x and y are in meters, U is in joules. When the particle moves from (2,0) to the origin, the work done by the conservatice force is:
A) b) c) d) (the choices don't matter... I have the right value, wrong sign)


Homework Equations



delta(U) = change in potential energy.

The Attempt at a Solution



Okay, my real question here is: What does this notation U(x,y) really mean?

And I checked the solution for this problem, and it says U(initial) - U(final)... Why is this? Since when is the change in a value equal to initial - final ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The notation U(x, y) is used to indicate that U is a function of two variables, x and y. The formula you show, however, is a function of x alone.
mike_302 said:
the potential energy of the particle is given by U(x,y)=2x + x^3 where x and y are in meters
Is there a typo in this formula? Should it be U(x, y) = 2x + y^3?
 
mike_302 said:
… I checked the solution for this problem, and it says U(initial) - U(final)... Why is this? Since when is the change in a value equal to initial - final ?

Hi mike_302! :smile:

(try using the X2 tag just above the Reply box :wink:)

Change in potential energy = minus the work done

ie ∆PE = -W

so the work done will be -∆PE = Uinitial - Ufinal
 
Okay, I completely see why it's Ui-Uf now but that U(x,y) notation seems messed up because there's no typo :P That's how it is written, and I get the answer using JUST x, so I guess it should've said U(x)= ...

Oh well!
 
mike_302 said:
… that U(x,y) notation seems messed up because there's no typo :P That's how it is written, and I get the answer using JUST x, so I guess it should've said U(x)= ...

No, because potential is a function of position, and has to be defined at every position …

for example gravitational potential is U(x,y,z) = -gz. :wink: