Now it remains to be shown that A = B. I'll leave that to you.

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around demonstrating the invariance of the quantity s² = x² + y² + z² - c²t² using the Lorentz transformation. Participants are tasked with showing that the transformed coordinates lead to the same expression in a different frame of reference.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the form of the Lorentz transformation for the coordinates and time, questioning how to express t' and x' in terms of x and t. There are attempts to simplify expressions and check for cancellations in algebraic manipulations.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided algebraic manipulations and suggestions for simplification, while others express uncertainty about their progress and seek clarification on specific algebraic steps. There is an ongoing exploration of the transformations and their implications without a clear consensus on the final approach.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of maintaining correct forms of expressions and the need for common denominators in their calculations. There are indications of confusion regarding algebraic identities and transformations, which may affect their progress.

Nitric
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
1. Start with the expression x'^2 + y'^2 _ z'^2 -c^2t'^2 and show, with the aid of the Lorentz transofmration, that this quantity is equal to x^2 + y^2 + z^2 -c^2t^2. This result establishes the invariance of s^2 defined by s^2 = x^2 + y^2 + z^2 -c^2t^2



2. s^2 = x^2 + y^2 + z^2 -c^2t^2



3. So far I have y = y' and z = z' because of the transformation law. basically there is no lorentz contraction perpendicular to the motion of X so y = y' and z = z'

how do i really solve this problem? where should I start?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
So what does the Lorentz transformation look like for x' and t', in terms of x and t?
I mean, what is the correct full expression for

t' = ... t + ... x
x' = ... x + ... t
y' = y
z' = z
 
image022.gif
 

Attachments

  • image022.gif
    image022.gif
    640 bytes · Views: 370
  • image022.gif
    image022.gif
    640 bytes · Views: 376
  • image022.gif
    image022.gif
    640 bytes · Views: 393
  • image022.gif
    image022.gif
    640 bytes · Views: 388
  • image022.gif
    image022.gif
    640 bytes · Views: 370
  • image022.gif
    image022.gif
    640 bytes · Views: 394
Very nice. It's straightforward algebra then: plug them into
[itex]x^2 - c^2 t^2[/itex]
and show that you can simplify it to
[itex](x')^2 - c^2 (t')^2[/itex].
 
CompuChip said:
Very nice. It's straightforward algebra then: plug them into
[itex]x^2 - c^2 t^2[/itex]
and show that you can simplify it to
[itex](x')^2 - c^2 (t')^2[/itex].
so I would have
(x'+vt'/sqrt(1-v^2/c^2)^2 - c^2(t' + vx'/c^2 / sqrt(1-v^2/c^2) and simplify it algebraically to x'^2 - c^2t'^2 ?
 
Yes, the expression is a bit unclear, but it looks like what I got,
[tex]\frac{(x' + v t')^2 - (t' + v x' / c^2)^2}{(\sqrt{1 - v^2/c^2)^2}[/tex]
Just work out the multiplication (don't forget the cross-term). Then you'll see some cancellation taking place and you can factor the rest into something[itex]\,{}\times (x'^2 - c^2t'^2)[/itex].
 
thanks a lot, i will get on this now :D
 
I'm sort of stuck, my algebra isn't as fresh as I thought it would be. But am I on the right track though?

http://img264.imageshack.us/img264/1081/1233176495203dl2.jpg

^ My work
 
Last edited by a moderator:
You are on the right track, I see two terms cancelling.
Watch the squares however, I see c^2 t'^2 instead of (c^2 t')^2 and v x'^2 instead of (v x')^2...

Also it may help to write everything in one fraction.
 
  • #10
I need a common denominator to start canceling things out right, or can I do it before? This is the part where my algebra isn't as fresh as it should be. To get the common denominator, I have to multiply the left equation by c^4 (top and bottom) and multiple the right equation by 1 (top and bottom) correct?
 
  • #11
Okay I did what I said on the previous post and so far I have:

c^4[x'^2 + (vt')^2] - (c^2t')^2 - (vx'^2) / c^4(1-v^2/c^2)

What can I do now to move forward? I don't see anything else cancel out.
 
  • #12
Okay my way isn't right, still stuck on this :|
 
  • #13
It seems you're having a little problem with the algebra. Let me get you started.

Since y' = y and z' = z, it suffices to show that x'^2 - c^2 t'^2 = x^2 - c^2 t^2.
Plugging it in:

[tex]x^2 - c^2 t^2 = \left( \frac{ x' + v t' }{ \sqrt{1 - v^2 / c^2} } \right)^2 - c^2 \left( \frac{ t' + v x' / c^2 }{ \sqrt{1 - v^2 / c^2} } \right)^2.[/tex]
Let me take the c^2 in the second term inside the brackets (c^2 a^2 = (c a)^2) and take the square root outside ( (a/b)^2 = a^2 / b^2, sqrt(a)^2 = a):
[tex]x^2 - c^2 t^2 = \frac{ \left( x' + v t' \right)^2 - \left( c t' + v x' / c \right)^2 }{ 1 - v^2 / c^2 }.[/tex]
Open up the brackets:
[tex]x^2 - c^2 t^2 = \frac{ x'^2 + 2 x' v t' + v^2 t'^2 - c^2 t'^2 - 2 t' v x' - v^2 x'^2 / c^2 }{ 1 - v^2 / c^2 }.[/tex]

Two terms cancel, after tracing the above steps carefully (make sure you understand which manipulations I did and that I didn't make any sign errors :-p) collect the terms in (x')^2 and (t')^2, i.e. write
[tex]x^2 - c^2 t^2 = \frac{ A x'^2 + B t'^2 }{ 1 - v^2 / c^2 }.[/tex]
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K