Nth derivative and proof by induction

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on finding a general formula for the 'nth derivative' of the function f(x) = x^(2/3) and proving it using mathematical induction. The user, Alex, has proposed a recursive definition for the nth derivative but faces challenges in proving it by induction. A key insight shared in the discussion is that the recursive definition complicates the differentiation process, suggesting that a non-recursive formulation would facilitate the proof. The coefficient of the derivative involves a specific pattern with a numerator derived from products of integers and a denominator that is a power of 3.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of derivatives and their notation
  • Familiarity with mathematical induction
  • Knowledge of recursive and non-recursive functions
  • Basic algebra involving fractions and exponents
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the process of proving mathematical statements using induction
  • Learn about the properties of derivatives for fractional exponents
  • Explore non-recursive definitions of functions and their derivatives
  • Investigate the patterns in coefficients when differentiating polynomial functions
USEFUL FOR

Students studying calculus, particularly those focusing on derivatives and mathematical proofs, as well as educators looking for examples of induction in action.

adwong1
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi, I'm having a bit of trouble with finding a general formula for the 'nth derivative' for the function f(x)= x^2/3

So far I've figured out the formula (i think it's right), but I can't figure out how to prove it by induction, since I've never had to prove something like this before.

http://img354.imageshack.us/img354/3484/devoir8awn5.jpg


http://img412.imageshack.us/img412/776/devoir8bbe5.jpg

Thanks in advance. I tried to lay it out as neatly as i possibly could

Alex
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I understand what you're trying to say for the powers of x, but your expression
[tex]f^{(n-1)} (x ^{-1})[/tex] doesn't mean what you intend it to mean.

You have written [tex]f^{(n)} (x)[/tex] recursively. I think that your recursive definition won't help you in your proof by induction, since you won't be able to take the derivative of the right hand side. If you had the right side written nonrecursively, you would be able to take its derivative. In the coefficient of the derivative expression, you have a fraction, with the numerator being a product of 2(-1)(-4) and so on, and the denominator being 3 raised to the same power as there are factors in the numerator. The exponent on x will be 2/3 - that same number. Maybe you can work with these ideas.
 

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K