Number of electron of a Hydrogen atom (molecule)

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the calculation of the number of electrons in a hydrogen atom using its normalized 1D wave function, specifically for the quantum state n=1, l=0, m_l=0. The user initially attempts to apply a numerical integration technique but encounters discrepancies in the expected result of 1 electron. The key issue identified is the misunderstanding of the wave function's dimensionality; it is a 3D function in spherical coordinates, not 1D. The correct normalization involves integrating over the entire volume in spherical coordinates, leading to the conclusion that the radial wave function should be expressed as exp(-r/a0).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics and wave functions
  • Familiarity with spherical coordinates and integration techniques
  • Knowledge of numerical methods for integration
  • Basic proficiency in programming for numerical simulations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the normalization of wave functions in quantum mechanics
  • Learn about spherical coordinates and their application in quantum systems
  • Explore numerical integration techniques, particularly for multi-dimensional integrals
  • Investigate the properties of Gaussian wave functions in quantum mechanics
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those focusing on quantum mechanics, computational physics, and numerical analysis. This discussion is beneficial for anyone looking to deepen their understanding of wave functions and their applications in atomic theory.

torehan
Messages
41
Reaction score
0
Hi,
If the normalized 1D wave-function of hydrogen atom for n=1, l=0, m_l=0;

\psi_{1s}(x)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{\pi} a_{0}^{3/2}}e^{-x/a_{0}}

and probability distribution of wave-function,

\mid\psi_{1s}(x)^2\mid

so integration of rho over all x should give the number of electrons which is equal to 1

\int{\mid\psi_{1s}(x)^2\mid}dx=1

theory is simple and understandable. But when I apply a numerical procedure to this mathematical aspect I couldn't get the right result.
With a very simple computer program,hoping to find number of electrons, I use the easiest integration technique as converting integral to a discrete sum of each value of the charge density function multiplied by dx which is increment of variable x,

Code:
a0=0.53;
x=-10*a0:0.001:10*a0; 
R=-0.36;
NORM=1/sqrt(%pi*a0^3);
dx=20*a0/size(x,2);
nelect=0;

psi1s=NORM*exp(-abs((x-R))/a0);
rho1s=psi1s^2;
for i=1:size(x,2)
  nelect=nelect+rho(i)*dx;
end
return nelect;
Code:
> nelect= 1.1331234

But this doesn't return the correct value of nelect.

Am I making a fundamental mistake which I couldn't see right now?

Thanks
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
torehan said:
If the normalized 1D wave-function of hydrogen atom for n=1, l=0, m_l=0;

Well, there's your problem: There's no 1-dimensional wave function here, it's a 3-dimensional function in spherical coordinates, where your 'x' is the radial distance (usually denoted r). It's just that you don't have an angle-dependency for s-type functions..

So the normalization is:
\int |\psi(\vec{x})|^2 dV = \int_0^{2\pi}\int_{-\pi}^{\pi}\int_0^\infty |\psi(r,\theta,\varphi)|^2 r^2 sin(\theta) dr d\theta d\varphi = 1

If you don't have an angle-dependency then you just integrate over the surface of a sphere, so:
\int_0^{2\pi}\int_{-\pi}^{\pi}\int_0^\infty |\psi(r,\theta,\varphi)|^2 r^2 sin(\theta) dr d\theta d\varphi = 2\pi \int_0^\infty r^2 |\psi(r)|^2 dr = 1
 
That last line should read:

\int_0^{2\pi}\int_{-\pi}^{\pi}\int_0^\infty |\psi(r,\theta,\varphi)|^2 r^2 sin(\theta) dr d\theta d\varphi = 4\pi \int_0^\infty r^2 |\psi(r)|^2 dr = 1
 
(1-(-1))*2*pi = 4*pi.. you're right! :)
 
Thanks for the replies.

But I'm not sure about the boundaries of the integration with respect to r and \varphi

I think the integration over all space must be like,

\int_0^{2\pi}\int_{0}^{\pi}\int_{-\infty}^\infty |\psi(r,\theta,\varphi)|^2 r^2 sin(\theta) dr d\theta d\varphi = 2\pi \int_{-\infty}^\infty r^2 |\psi_{1s}|^2 dr = 1

Please correct me if I'm wrong.
 
Assuming that

<br /> \int_0^{2\pi}\int_{0}^{\pi}\int_{-\infty}^\infty |\psi(r,\theta,\varphi)|^2 r^2 sin(\theta) dr d\theta d\varphi = 2\pi \int_{-\infty}^\infty r^2 |\psi_{1s}|^2 dr = 1<br />

is correct,
If I use a Gaussian as a hydrogen 1s wave-function what would be the normalization constant?

(And here is the question one. Which one is the correct form for a Gaussian wave-function? 2nd. one?)
1.
\psi_{1s}(r)=Ne^{-r/a_{0}}
2.
\psi_{1s}(r)=Ne^{-r^2/a_{0}}
\int\mid\psi_{1s}(r)\mid^2dV=N^2\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}e^{r^2/a_{0}^2}dV=1
\int_0^{2\pi}\int_{0}^{\pi}\int_{-\infty}^\infty |\psi_{1s}(r,\theta,\varphi)|^2 r^2 sin(\theta) dr d\theta d\varphi = 2\pi \int_{-\infty}^\infty r^2 |\psi_{1s}(r)|^2 dr = 1

2\pi N^2\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}r^2dre^{r^2/a0^2}=1

where a=1/a_0^2
\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}r^2dre^{-ar^2}= \frac{1}{2}\sqrt{\frac{\pi}{a^3}}\frac{1}{2}\sqrt{\frac{\pi}{a^3}}=\frac{1}{2}\sqrt{\pi}a_0^3

N^2=\frac{1}{a_0^3 \pi^{3/2}}

I think derivation of normalization constant like that. Can you see anything nonsense?Even I integrate normalized wave-function I couldn't get the result 1. ouf!
 
Last edited:
You're right that theta goes from 0 to pi. I missed that before. But r goes from 0 to infinity. A radius by definition must be greater than zero. So the angular integrals give:
\int_0^{2\pi}\int_0^\pi sin(\theta)d\theta d\phi = 2\pi (-cos(\pi)+cos(0)) = 4\pi
Of course we know that the surface area of a sphere is 4 pi r^2, so the angular integral mustgive 4 pi. As far as the radial integral, the radial wavefunction goes like exp(-r/a0), not exp(-r^2/a0). Try this reference:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydrogen_atom
 
Trying again to get the LateX right. Note that:(e^{-\frac{r}{a_0}})^2 = e^{-\frac{2 r}{a_0}}, NOT e^{-\frac{r^2}{a_0^2}}
 
I have problems on getting used to latex.

Thanks
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K